[dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7839 (7016)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 July 2022 12:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA6CC14F74D; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUsFoIMJwXWu; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47240C14CEFC; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id F09004C0A1; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: aland@deployingradius.com, shwethab@cisco.com, sgundave@cisco.com, mgrayson@cisco.com, volz@cisco.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220712123143.F09004C0A1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 05:31:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/3tsqwpGIXpbm2Aqtcz_HZdGwUqw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:05:52 -0700
Subject: [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7839 (7016)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:31:48 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7839, "Access-Network-Identifier Option in DHCP". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7016 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Date Reported: 2022-07-07 Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 4.4.1 Original Text ------------- Length 4 Operator-Identifier The Operator-Identifier is a variable-length Private Enterprise Number (PEN) ... Corrected Text -------------- Length 4 Operator-Identifier The Operator-Identifier is a 32-bit Private Enterprise Number (PEN) ... Notes ----- Either the length is 4, and the contents are 32-bits. Or the length is >1, and the length is variable. My guess is that the intention is to have a fixed length. The variable-length encoding from RFC 6757 is likely not needed here. *** verifier note *** See Bernie Volz's reply in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Y4yaYwaqxS0B2nWw5f4xER2fSMk/ -------------------------------------- RFC7839 (draft-ietf-dhc-access-network-identifier-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Access-Network-Identifier Option in DHCP Publication Date : June 2016 Author(s) : S. Bhandari, S. Gundavelli, M. Grayson, B. Volz, J. Korhonen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Dynamic Host Configuration Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7839 (7016) RFC Errata System