IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Please review version -07 of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 20 October 2014 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9AC1A8035 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RSXAmffKSmK for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397C81A6F28 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id em10so7786277wid.4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wxohf7+pkCF130OenSKYbgJRTcbVjY6GaT5CMaqNBbU=; b=a2C14jZMWOtd0CyVSBR4V/PMvRUtkLxmYclHsfIijKktojs5AR+ETL5ieUfCLbnqzT CaVOb/1RBPvqsydinnRVae/l4p11nXWSSXG9wl3WsymUUFYziBGgZwZoud827sVFYn9e 8lLKakZZ+Q1y/A0EW7Z1RrrECME4mqKyEvlqATRXYJ8RMRMVaEagVcmd1eF6PtEp+4hd idr1vK3zzzNnkeIt7yBSDWXsdV34n/hJ0A3CCDlaqtFT0NfScKyEwUzvzWHgFArXcuEo eZN2blUpQuBPkV38bFq9sirLl/hSSwIrDp/WSBFiLj5W7Of9AC0ILfoeYK6rAs0TgIzt jHLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.82.105 with SMTP id h9mr5280297wiy.62.1413825512634; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.79.202 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5444F104.1060009@gmail.com>
References: <542D1698.7030203@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcJS45ULDLaGgzgE5ZeS-hFZhWUX4819-T_jObroJnv4Q@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6CEE2D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAJE_bqeNyWa=hxyaaDRqUR0zgnfQCSZZOnToXSaSWm0m4CjUYg@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6D18F3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6D1B3A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAJE_bqe4xsP7eHBpvTZsw0VobpMnnG2MvYuMgXvKF+nrUS2yDw@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6D4548@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <5444F104.1060009@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:18:32 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BQpSq9k0z47Sxw2cDqMQ0yVeLCQ
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqe9gG1QYNm2Vq1vhnw5VRhSEUFd_P-fM2ayKDbB17TAQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/4GO8D4Z_En8kjJR3p84hjFgCDyo
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Please review version -07 of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:20:56 -0000

At Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:24:52 +0200,
Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com> wrote:

> How about this text:
>
>    "To deal with the case where servers have not yet been updated
>     to that, clients MUST select the T1/T2 times from a single IA
>     option and the selected T1/T2 times must guarantee that the client
>     will send Renew/Rebind messages not later than at T1/T2 times associated
>     with any of the client's bindings. The details how the server
>     chooses IA with the candidate T1/T2 times is out of scope for
>     this document."

This also looks fine to me.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email