[dhcwg] RAAN & SRSN drafts

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Mon, 20 April 2009 04:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B543A6A4D for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.592, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdrwDQY7asmz for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth12.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth12.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AE163A695D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11569 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2009 04:27:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.120.225.34) by smtpauth12.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.35) with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2009 04:27:20 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'Dhcwg WG' <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:27:13 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <003401c9c170$492fff30$db8ffd90$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcnBcEcmFtfRk17ORDew33wUI8blEw==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [dhcwg] RAAN & SRSN drafts
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:26:08 -0000

Is there some reason of which I am unaware that these two documents should
not be combined?

~gwz

At one time in the US, in the mid-nineteenth century, working for wage labor
was considered not very different from chattel slavery...anyone who thinks
it's legitimate to be a wage laborer is internalizing oppression in a way
which would have seemed intolerable to people in the mills 150 years ago.
  -- Noam Chomsky, "Propaganda & the Public Mind"