Re: [dhcwg] [Roll] MPL config draft (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-01.txt)

Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp> Sun, 20 July 2014 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364F61B29BD; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLD1_ts4OHKO; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp (imx12.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389381B29BE; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arc11.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.90.127]) by imx12.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id s6KJOMKM019501; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by arc11.toshiba.co.jp id s6KJOMr6012759; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ovp11.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.90.148] by arc11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id EAA12758; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +0900
Received: from mx2.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id s6KJOMYl002294; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from spiffy21.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id s6KJOMJ5001756; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [133.199.16.43] (ivpn-1-43.mobile.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.16.43]) by spiffy21.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA4C97D10; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:21 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <53CC1763.3010309@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:24:19 +0900
From: Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <20140701155803.14047.81610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53BA92D9.3000606@toshiba.co.jp> <CAL10_BqyWcb9_NBq2RzX7oX9g356ypYYDntVASX53q_D7Lrhdg@mail.gmail.com> <53BBA3EF.9040609@toshiba.co.jp> <43CF020C-1007-40A9-8F58-0B4F64672736@nominum.com> <3C9237BF-BF7F-43BF-8A12-35CB9BE6E7F1@gmail.com> <E39AD318-FF6E-44A3-A3C8-4321B86B65FA@nominum.com> <7303.1405801664@sandelman.ca> <ECC89C10-A379-4D54-ABAB-08A869E58A1A@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <ECC89C10-A379-4D54-ABAB-08A869E58A1A@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/6JWnxKiRaWhzMluuPIucMTzPP9M
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Roll] MPL config draft (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-01.txt)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:24:27 -0000

Hi Ted,

Thanks for your suggestion. As I wrote to Bernie, I'll update the draft
with standard data types.

Regards,

Yusuke


(2014-07-20 6:20), Ted Lemon wrote:
> Okay, thanks.   I think compressing is saving three bytes; this is noise.   Please don't do that.   We need to define a fragment type for unsigned short floating point; that should be a quick, simple DHCP document.   The rest of the document looks fine at first glance, but as you've no doubt detected, I didn't read it before asking about the previous thing and I still haven't read it closely, so don't take that as a claim that I won't comment further later when I have more time (whenever that magic day comes).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>