[dhcwg] Valid values for DHCPv6 option 18 (Interface ID)
Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Wed, 12 March 2014 00:10 UTC
Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44B61A063C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nWoMynqhCRAf for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F40111A04D2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com ([209.85.128.173]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob112.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUx+mA0OXc9YUaBTt/PxtNwcjMXddyT3Z@postini.com; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:44 PDT
Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oy12so9166487veb.4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VlYkVfRVLSp+/PCMVEs7yO18j59IqTeizjQEDN0g4zY=; b=D9AipTBZloY4SMetUIfd0kU1HiGGXHAH7Uk//ChUp+hxoAZ5WuDzC/da0z/Y7Di8cg PqnSJRSCUYkSy68giB/UigxG0dGU3n5RIZWr0Jo+Mt9X7aKLbC2Kvp3v0N6gsTMbOqaJ lxu0mvVCcInZE7UWyGmWiZpGlQd7pd5o6f9kD4gJB0no4h/Pwbx2xf4DdBwsp6mJdIEb WEQethnNoC6nJiYk4+8GGe5c4Kbhqq8aocWHFzyG1A2A9m6LlffvDW7PLIjrw7zJmUUs e8/V5WyyDKqOHdaRi/njSurv0uB6sed0EHF46HZXv8sC5nu85sQliRx3F96RYDHEfP/Z /iDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDYTc1W+rd80WfP7DTrVd4mqNJtQPCSYRX/s2Qqw5HpuBV0LA7Q5HBZewa0xzE1OLEJQtBAODt/qo+zFREcsMGHFDCrqpmuOleAGj9cK3yqsF0mgXvyk3nJE1M1tRHe4t7EllbU/w4eIbls0PNWSRBw8eduQ==
X-Received: by 10.220.103.141 with SMTP id k13mr3420522vco.25.1394583042968; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.103.141 with SMTP id k13mr3420517vco.25.1394583042906; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.145.137 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:10:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bqd48O4TpS4CWCW7rebjAiaoxfGWBy1ZYy-11AvY0iMnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/73cn_zB4i9LUVFWDKvHkCxMfi6o
Subject: [dhcwg] Valid values for DHCPv6 option 18 (Interface ID)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:10:51 -0000
Has there been any changes as to how option 18 has been defined by us? I'm running into certain programs (Wireshark, in particular) and devices that appear to be doing both: - Assuming it's printable - Interpreting the content Both appear to be strongly discouraged by 3315: The Interface-ID SHOULD be considered an opaque value, with policies based on exact match only; that is, the Interface-ID SHOULD NOT be internally parsed by the server. According to my interpretation, that says that one should neither be attempting to interpret the contents, nor try to display it as a string. Thoughts? -- Andre Kostur
- [dhcwg] Valid values for DHCPv6 option 18 (Interf… Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] Valid values for DHCPv6 option 18 (In… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Valid values for DHCPv6 option 18 (In… Simon Hobson