Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Thu, 07 January 2010 03:00 UTC
Return-Path: <hpa@zytor.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FF23A67B6; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtTcO3z1Oj1k; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terminus.zytor.com (terminus.zytor.com [198.137.202.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C73D3A67AD; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:00:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from anacreon.sc.intel.com (hpa@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o072vCIG003728 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:57:13 -0800
Message-ID: <4B454D88.1050804@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:57:12 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Theodore Vojnovich <tbvojnov@us.ibm.com>
References: <OFF7D512A7.9C5426BD-ON872576A3.007ACA1B-852576A3.007B5319@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFF7D512A7.9C5426BD-ON872576A3.007ACA1B-852576A3.007B5319@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>, Thomas Huth <THUTH@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:00:29 -0000
On 01/06/2010 02:27 PM, Theodore Vojnovich wrote: > > Arent you really going to want to say key is provide by independent > resource from the boot image resource. Ie if key is in memory, how did > it get there? This leads to the whole thread of key mgmt and deployment. > I dont think you want to get into all that but also dont think you want > limit this to just "configurable key in memory"...maybe at least hint > at the fact there may be > several simple to substantive approaches supported (since you may not > care how the key got into memory....just that it did not come from same > resource as boot image....otherwise might be hackable/spoofable/etc) > > Just my 2 cents. > Well, there really are only two options, aren't there... either the key came from somewhere physically on the system (ROM, TPM, or even disk), installed through some previous means, or it was fetched from some trusted portion of the network... Either which way it seems somewhat outside the scope of this particular RFC. -hpa
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Thomas Huth
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Thomas Huth
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Zimmer, Vincent
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 Theodore Vojnovich
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-netboot-07 H. Peter Anvin