Re: [dhcwg] draft-bpw-pcp-dhcp-00.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 12 October 2010 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108FC3A6985 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMRlVkbNGjSD for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2973A697C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTLRqSFXqOGAUOrVFWg9z40SsQYbKvxuU@postini.com; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:01:47 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC341B85B3; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vpna-148.vpn.nominum.com (64.89.227.148) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:01:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <9832_1286863080_4CB3F8E8_9832_26703_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F327C1008C4D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:01:34 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <8102353B-65C0-4F0C-AF52-78F22E076A31@nominum.com>
References: <F4BBCA3A-64E1-4929-BDFB-F7EBFAD918E3@nominum.com> <10443_1286813519_4CB3374F_10443_28372_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F327C1008BD5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <2ACB3C3E-D437-49EC-8976-C8BC79ABEA6D@nominum.com> <9832_1286863080_4CB3F8E8_9832_26703_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F327C1008C4D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org Group" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Reinaldo Penno <rpenno@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-bpw-pcp-dhcp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:00:34 -0000

On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:57 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
> One of the main use cases of the PCP is to control Carrier Grade NAT such as DS-Lite CGN or NAT64. It is likely that the PCP Server be co-located with the CGN function. A similar use case is discussed in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg01649.html:load-balancing.

Okay, so get rid of the IP address option.