IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948F1ACD42; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYEwYVNS0jc0; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1001ACD3D; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so24411665pab.1; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NNhyhmCAvxcv8hIpj2XAw8LFKj1k+9ZcspZncnPpbyk=; b=dwjVKyJi28qGv9eVWT+zMFaTXes4P2XhnUFPupmLGfPT8w2DbtS4Dw7C8wIFEZfL1m o3ENsOqdanIYvn2tfG0Bg/iCb/KEiWfmVGEwkMgKbCmqQ4Yju3tSYdzD4Iu3Q578kk3z heOtB1Fox3PBudNv1lRcl/2j5OTTwDOSuup3SOYOJGeFHZZlP9pxJpATbyY1viRIz6df izr8lE3NhgMGKdy/6a6hGEHiTtY78RUKIp617fhLLZvFu5iu4mG6T0dpM9GHRq+UiGaB p9/p12MZ1VjLbyo7uXzM0fnQPXj8OtHG2j4GTSPpx13jBFzN18Wi1XfmMj/lMcsyiUYp Votg==
X-Received: by 10.66.230.229 with SMTP id tb5mr5907068pac.44.1432822042794; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.8.20.2] ([107.191.118.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qg5sm2567695pdb.13.2015.05.28.07.07.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 May 2015 07:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55670889.30503@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:07:12 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3812E74-539E-4F2D-9A1B-21406A9E0805@gmail.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CAF5DA3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <55670179.8030400@cs.tcd.ie> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CAF5EC1@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <20150528.141105.74661164.sthaug@nethelp.no> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CAF6142@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <55670889.30503@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/APPmcDyhowFUIKhWanhU1zRrPqQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:12:55 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.ad@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhc-chairs@ietf.org" <dhc-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation@ietf.org>, "ted.lemon@nominum.com" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.shepherd@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:07:29 -0000

Dear Stephen,

A side note (maybe you’ve already noted it) is that, the Client Identifier option is also part of the DHCPv4 anonymity profile (Section 3.4). I assume draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-00 is not intending to obsolete client identifier since it’s needed for DHCP to work. 

Thanks,
Qi

On May 28, 2015, at 8:22 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 28/05/15 13:19, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>> Note also that there is work going on in the DHC WG to address
>> privacy issues - see draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-00. And one of
>> the authors (the primary author) is from Microsoft so I am sure this
>> is on their radar.
> 
> So just to be clear: the reason I'm asking about this is mainly
> that I want to be sure that this draft doesn't make deploying
> the privacy one harder/impossible.
> 
> S.
> 
> PS: Am in a bit of a rush to get something else done right now
> so probably won't be able to continue this discussion until later
> or tomorrow.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email