IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-sun-dhc-port-set-option

Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com> Thu, 18 October 2012 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A12221F8754 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HY8bByA3HHYa for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEB321F86D5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fl11so10553720vcb.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ppI5q4gWPz1dGJbd8Md0ds9sznMOzen5guo+zO4LhgU=; b=vG12hRPMBhyNpwi3X06MWr0qfvfTXOri7R0wZRmg+wlOXUnCjY/P1+qJ2ayO3/oBJA Hty3xAD2WePGNks/qAIP5ltFfycU6/n4rQ2kBtiGE6ZQo13SAdYq3TRzVi8xqljA4TcO fFRb4NkWR9DgQAHpna0m4TnKQz8eEmoRUs4VOaLeiEfuvqb8c2hbX6NaY3R9zlx1Xq82 9VkRcFHbIrM6Ecu5WffK1Aqtk75ImRKbV/Fmp8BYBhjZedChu2W3K6Hh933d3l2BFViv osQFX9Yk3yovAqBQ/MwsWLfTmCFc99Zf3jXW9tG87PD5/ZDZrGanFAH6e8zZTuS5fa78 e4oA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.89.172 with SMTP id bp12mr12412049vdb.19.1350571519734; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.163.102 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B42AF6CD-A628-49EB-A207-FFEB59AE72D6@employees.org>
References: <9D3C0AC1-D5B1-4C25-AC47-4D08E3252D54@nominum.com> <CAFFjW4i_-+5WERMhM1ZFGwcKarv1hBc7NVvaKn7XQBWq02C=mQ@mail.gmail.com> <50800059.3030503@viagenie.ca> <4E18E4F4-7E60-41F7-8700-83EF2CF1D4A4@employees.org> <219448E3-6A90-411D-A430-EDE011E5E75E@nominum.com> <50F411F4-D3C5-4CED-B9BD-5E552C61C5EE@employees.org> <C2BE5A50-005C-406C-933E-B8CF0FBD5ABE@gmail.com> <B42AF6CD-A628-49EB-A207-FFEB59AE72D6@employees.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:45:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC16W0CgK=LtrFnNt4grHpxs-+giZv7UUsddQvOs5kuzSih3=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: sunqi <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>, "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-sun-dhc-port-set-option
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:45:21 -0000

If we only need contiguous port range as you said, we only need a
contiguous mask and that's all. Perfect match. No other MAP parameters
or non-contiguous port set format as an outcome of MAP.

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>> This draft does proposed a contiguous mask to allocate contiguous port-set. And the draft is a merged version of
>> draft-wu-dhc-port-set-option-00 and draft-bajko-pripaddrassign-04. The authors have reached the consensus to use mask for contiguous port-set allocation, which is easy to implement both for client and server.
>
> if this proposal is also advocating a contiguous mask, then I don't understand why you cannot use the proposal in draft-ietf-softwire-map?
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email