IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF 81 meeting...

David Hankins <dhankins@google.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dhankins@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11A1F0C44 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHl5Vu+7oD4P for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42801F0C5D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.69]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p67HjJaZ028399 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1310060720; bh=g+vM8V65baFHxtSs31pOI1gvY80=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=v+zIX9G3cEnTvPMzMNIN0L9OTYpkNwIkh3zASPfxEdShtT4SVwzaArIyAR3iHTSfj bJd859o4i7MuNG1aj+3ag==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=MZfWLm7nBOdC4jcKjXr7PUv9xQ6N6QPob3IMz01/FG1biiMFXwE8t2YBBAamjTV7K UlAeO1mLr+cjva9wKtEEA==
Received: from pvg18 (pvg18.prod.google.com [10.241.210.146]) by wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p67HjHov029123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:18 -0700
Received: by pvg18 with SMTP id 18so763031pvg.24 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E1+Biqnqo8XnsSA47h+c1ELO3atrL7Ou4cyqFVU8pVY=; b=PXa3lSMpC4vkstvIJOYfUAj0Fr7OtN3DwUH7Yfi6KvWMaC5BxAqyHFR0D7mZXIkfB+ KnV59S83S3aTBteH20fw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.26.134 with SMTP id l6mr1508463pbg.50.1310060717256; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.77.21 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA295242.145264%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
References: <B3AFF18D-BE2A-45B8-B1AB-7D448E7E77F1@nominum.com> <CA295242.145264%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:45:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CACLSHdRwVkV8XfeyjQ3QF2zAfBAhYjM+6_pbagYpBXwwqq7NNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Hankins <dhankins@google.com>
To: dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec5215fa3afaf6104a77e477b"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF 81 meeting...
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:45:21 -0000

After my haitus, I'd like some time, 5-10 minutes, to reboot my two
remaining drafts;

  draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines
  draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpinform-clarify

In particular, since I am no longer a DHCP server implementer, I don't have
any long-term interest in the dhpcinform-clarify draft (I don't intend to
implement WG consensus myself, as I had originally conceived).

-- 
David W. Hankins
SRE - Systems Engineer
Google, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email