IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-failover-12.txt

Greg Kilfoyle <gregk@redback.com> Tue, 04 November 2003 16:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22236 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:51:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AH4OZ-0000ZN-Oe for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:51:07 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hA4Gp7m9002183 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:51:07 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AH4OZ-0000Z8-Ho for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:51:07 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22197 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:50:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AH4OY-0000a0-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:51:06 -0500
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AH4OX-0000Zx-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:51:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AH4OU-0000YI-7v; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:51:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AH4Nw-0000WA-Oh for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:50:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22164 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:50:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AH4Nv-0000ZN-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:50:27 -0500
Received: from manatick.foretec.com ([4.17.168.5] helo=manatick) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AH4Nv-0000ZK-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:50:27 -0500
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by manatick with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AH4Nv-0007JL-Gt for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:50:27 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EF854D202; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12075-10; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa (hover.redback.com [155.53.42.186]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DFD54D207; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-failover-12.txt
From: Greg Kilfoyle <gregk@redback.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20031031083814.01f53720@flask.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20031031083814.01f53720@flask.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1067964388.23897.378.camel@gar.kilfoyle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 (1.4.3-2)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:46:29 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I decided to take a more active role in this WG rather than be a casual
observer. I don't have others' advantage (?) of going through the
evolution of this draft - it's a lot to consume all at once.

I'm also not sure what qualifies a person for voting on a draft. Is it
just a member of this list that has read the draft or is there more to
it?

I'm in favor for advancing this draft except for 1 item which I need
cleared up - the payload offset is listed as 8 bytes but it appears to
me it should be 12 bytes. The ISC code has it as 12 bytes.

Cheers, Greg. 
-- 
Greg Kilfoyle <gregk@redback.com>


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email