Re: [dhcwg] IETF 82 Agenda
Tomasz Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Thu, 03 November 2011 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7349C1F0CA9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wAjzkPf-bgJW for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B6E1F0C6F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so1731584wwi.13 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rC4KFWpyM1lgkBQ/DKeopc5Dp/EAyx6wZaoWKRZj59g=; b=iLUZf0kY1328BFg9HGNsVQHAX42boh2/tPzlH582T4HeWygyKHum14go0Idh7gu4y1 4sRRFs3HtFY8wU8SvZiJyvgmQHVm5H2GP4nwWqQfxGVkC3AmCk5r3rPORKNgi3dh+W3B dSsRH13/ENld7yovvJJfboOhA+lyBxKOsFuU4=
Received: by 10.227.208.71 with SMTP id gb7mr14048394wbb.7.1320354083719; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Tomasz-Mrugalski.local (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fy13sm12372988wbb.18.2011.11.03.14.01.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EB30120.9010007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:01:20 +0100
From: Tomasz Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <0EA10484-1946-457F-AEE2-CE4A7C8B6A71@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <0EA10484-1946-457F-AEE2-CE4A7C8B6A71@nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF 82 Agenda
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:01:31 -0000
On 11-11-02 21:34, Ted Lemon wrote: > I just uploaded the agenda, which is quite short. I think I must have > missed some submissions, but I can't find them. If you think you're on > the agenda, please check. > > Thanks! > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/dhc.html Ted, I can present following things. Please add them to the agenda, if you believe they are worthy topics for discussion. 1. Post-WGLC status of Redundancy Considerations draft Not sure if that presentation is required. Changes are rather editorial, with one substantial clarification. Draft: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02 Time slot: 5 minutes 2. DHCPv6 suboptions clarification draft. Draft: draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-suboptions-02 There was strong support that this clarification draft is needed. Unfortunately, there's no concensus on how proceed with this. This presentation will be a summary of current opinions and a request for guideance regarding next steps. Time slot: 5 minutes 3. DHCPv6 route options draft. Draft: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03 I'd like to summarize WGLC that is in progress in MIF and will conclude before Taipei. In particular, I'd like to discuss author's proposal regarding DHCP preference over RA. It was presented in DHC already, but routing configuration is an important topic, so I'd like to present it once more. Time slot: 5 minutes Cheers, Tomek
- [dhcwg] IETF 82 Agenda Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] IETF 82 Agenda Tomasz Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] IETF 82 Agenda Ted Lemon