Re: [dhcwg] One comment on draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-05.txt

Ted Lemon wrote:

>I don't want to downplay the coolness of what you guys are doing - it is 
>actually a very interesting idea, and it would be great if we could figure 
>out how to make it work in the context of 3315id.   I don't think that's out 
>of the question.   The point of the criticism is simply to identify a 
>problem, so that a better solution can be worked out.
>  
>
Oh no I completely understand. My questions about 3315id were not 
related to the p-DAD proposal (and that is why I wrote a separate 
email), I was just trying to better understand your draft as I found it 
very interesting. That's all.
All comments and feedback are always very wellcome.

Going back to my question about 3315id, I guess what it is not clear to 
me is how does the DHCP client decide the IAID value for each interface? 
How does the DHCP client know if an application will simply switch 
between interfaces on the same wire (in this case I can use the same IP 
address/ same IAID to keep my identity and show continuous connectivity) 
or if it will use both interfaces on the same wire at the same time ( I 
use different IP/different IAID)?
Please know that I am much more familiar with DHCPv4 than DHCPv6.

-Andrea

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg