IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00.txt

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Thu, 31 January 2013 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01B121F8460 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1O11pbOF6B91 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys010aog104.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog104.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7530D21F878F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f200.google.com ([209.85.128.200]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob104.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUQnVBdWv6j4vqIlyBWTDNAdM15y8TENh@postini.com; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:54 PST
Received: by mail-ve0-f200.google.com with SMTP id ox1so218161veb.11 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=3Pzz5ao76luWEu1TSEdeuwpDx+lZZaNCsP3wwrb3mew=; b=PfEblFEHLQ2tb6JDmV+OyWsYRXwbbmDUUy96o3oGUi4BLOh5rollwCAmyCME1y5y7f GHp4nK8o8kdJfZojHq4r6QqM1Rt2U35iSghGmRw3puh2RE1GtOGIbb2w5iTbFG9bQGOL 5BIZYwSZ+DrpR4Gm3zuwLjF+fpqGCZOXh303/4glfqQOH7WsbHnTAqh/Ua9l46dUoWVF Ploj+4HZ5z6HtP4aOAA8mUlKtpHlz2Ahr6E+Wg7Lm14+b9MzpbWQzDabs9bU8UJb423W NtgnZ3HY7S42vSwFpgocULPzZHbZUEEHTe8WGpKwqfF/z0za5+PVNqr8XoFpaiyHx4IZ Bysg==
X-Received: by 10.58.181.42 with SMTP id dt10mr2493695vec.34.1359598852939; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.181.42 with SMTP id dt10mr2493689vec.34.1359598852798; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.0.212 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747475B92@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20121214022919.19971.21882.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAfac2gCqq4KxCUt3pd5danhhgdPbNCakBXJwGooPx1jyGEmag@mail.gmail.com> <CAAfac2i9f+nA-S6bsoRy58gOn+mj8fnniVPr3PHNgZXboDwztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL10_BrnrQbO4Bzq5mE_9s_e1-jtCtb=Nq5wjaUr0mE3fTUv9A@mail.gmail.com> <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061966F0@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747458F@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A118C@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307474754C3@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <FB329D818C7CAB438F0C7DD772EA1025061A2F00@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747475B92@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:20:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bq-zkZv7hD0CVD8notzh2O5gBipLs4ACn3qQQVX8jXQ3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRrcTarWJx+X2X2W7l4XaQpIjFL+r13e7pPaTyxpS1fOfC4YqyXmAEfqGGGiQpeD/FCq/cViIrx8Qlw/dbE6Q+bi7k9MVdhlwTtNw66nhk3eqUKjPOOZMYAq7nnMUlis1b8tOBE5TURBd3a1TOISHnv+YlBA==
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:20:57 -0000

Not directly related to this draft (as this is a consideration after
the device obtains some addresses), but if one of these
restricted-power devices wished to be able to do Reconfigure, how
would that work?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> So, if practically all servers reply with responses (if they reply at all) within seconds/minutes (e.g. current max RT fixed in the original 3315 - 120s + random deviation), and given the client will eventually retry anyway, I'm trying to understand whether there is indeed a strong reason for a client to wait for an hour.
>
> I suspected this was the issue you had in mind.   I think it would make sense to add something to the draft that addresses this issue.
>



-- 
Andre Kostur
Distinguished Software Architect & Engineer
P: 604-678-2864
E: akostur@incognito.com
Toll-Free: 1-800-877-1856


F: 604-678-2864
VoIP: sip:864@sip.incognito.com

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status