Re: [dhcwg] WG Session @ IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Agenda Requests - Deadline 2/14/2016

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED11B3921 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:06:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfsJWJcOt8wS for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73FCE1B3918 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:06:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=20968; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454681210; x=1455890810; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:mime-version; bh=LZlz5HOqWJgePY37bumXBBrQvFOw0X2JZYD4FH26JxU=; b=fszNkWO2i/TbCJ/S1cpJmFHSexuhq79ivNqeZnbHcJYDesRH0sAxAfqY L03fP7Hv+mqX+oa7LG86No9MTsKrjlJFe4L49wZI+6wZh64k+M4d5NfBt r1wohDyYjqAhZxi/Rkmf4DMdO3ihcBv2uqAIf1qvs08Wb2DhYQSUWfwxR M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AdAgAqq7RW/5ldJa1egm5MUm0GiFWueoITAQ2BZiGFbAKBMDgUAQEBAQEBAX8LhEEBAQEELVwCAQgRBAEBIQcHMhQJCAEBBBMIiBMOv18BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERBIpJhF8JhAQFh12GeYgfAYVLh32BYoRDiFWFbohPAR4BAUKCAxmBSGqJAHwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,400,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217";a="233838610"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2016 14:06:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u15E6nID021211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:06:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:06:48 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:06:48 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Session @ IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Agenda Requests - Deadline 2/14/2016
Thread-Index: AdFHORD4y95fMyRVQ56UWvb6lX4DVgQbpvJgAh2sP8A=
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:06:48 +0000
Message-ID: <0bf34ed92a34400f98edf4c48151750c@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <005134edeb9e4550b55a23776afaef15@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0bf34ed92a34400f98edf4c48151750cXCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/DLFUUpn499J9z49kKZFx9SnbUU4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Session @ IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Agenda Requests - Deadline 2/14/2016
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:06:53 -0000

Hi:

The current agenda requests are at https://github.com/dhcwg/wg/wiki/IETF-95-(Buenos-Aires)-DHC-WG-Agenda.

We need all requests for time to be submitted by 2/14 so we can determine appropriate time to request for the IETF-95 slot.

Thanks to those that have send their requests.


-          Bernie

From: Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WG Session @ IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Agenda Requests - Deadline 2/14/2016

Just a reminder about requesting agenda slots!

We have only one request:

-          DHCPv6 bis

I would think we MAY want to discuss:

-          Secure DHCPv6 (and draft-li-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-deployment)

-          DHCPv6 Prefix Length Hint Issues (though perhaps we'll just want to try to WGLC this?)

-          Yang model?

-          Failover?

-          Relay Initiated Release (though this would need an update based on the IETF-94 discussions)??


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:45 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG Session @ IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Agenda Requests - Deadline 2/14/2016
Importance: High

Hi:

The scheduling requests for meeting slots for IETF-95 in Buenos Aires have opened up (we must submit a request before 2/19/2016).

Our plan for IETF-95 will be the same as we did for IETF-94:

-                      We are encouraging agenda requests NOW thru February 14th, 2016 (this will give us a few days to organize the agenda and decide on the session length request).

-                      We will submit our time request for IETF-95 based on the RECEIVED agenda requests (by the February 14th deadline).

-                      Requests after February 14th will most likely be REJECTED (once the time slot is filled). In the past we have been more accommodating, but because of the pressure on IETF meeting time, we are being asked to justify our time slot request. And meeting time should be used to discuss and resolve issues, not present overviews of drafts or status updates.

Therefore, please submit requests as soon as you can (and well before 2/14) if you do plan to present at the DHC WG session in Buenos Aires.

As in the past, please provide:

Title Of Session:
Presenter:
Related Drafts:
Time Required:
Purpose of Session:

We do want to remind those requesting time that you should focus on discussing key issues that need resolution to move a draft forward.

We are 3 months from that next meeting.


-          Tomek & Bernie