IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc8415bis-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 October 2022 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64ACC15271C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6BzwqmUk0OOK for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18AE6C15270B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0411800D; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZTusZodc1pQh; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6381800C; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1665592839; bh=NF26PQquSBkvObBuYGXi3tXyf7ZOvjPLhnJyRuTUx7w=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OW7wdf93P5/tNA1DLPAuu9YIBWfbE2xUCzPjSheFeMRg+Mj/9w5nH5JuTMdQffXi5 bpK0W7gBX8r3OdLZd7vdY4qtbcIM+x2wlN1FKgFBUe2+uOfsbSPoWBwxIxsIPBrGxc fcLJAlIdm6MUz7ltxZNj4mEQ+ATynYgzySruy6fP+oDrdAWaQbcRMibVB1YOX4kj0U 4+0vFbx5r87rEM0OGlK0gsXld406d3iAzGLZKOs8IpsgLUzN7Si1o+NxITk1tu825U ZkDNN7uBW5eflrxnKIOES481gjKgZp3IHxV1aD8CXz0K70lgsk7Dt3WLOGH6h6eWrX w0diIhkMZOA5w==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB86135; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BA9AD81B-24EA-49A1-8BEA-6AC08AED0660@gmail.com>
References: <9800.1665515402@localhost> <BA9AD81B-24EA-49A1-8BEA-6AC08AED0660@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:17:36 -0400
Message-ID: <12339.1665591456@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Fu9OgHy440xh34teKpFCp-Hfiww>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc8415bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:17:48 -0000

Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Maybe it has something to do with I-D vs RFC generation?

v2 XML vs v3 XML and changes/improvements to the xml2rfc program.

    > Anyway, those are fairly quick and easy to ignore.

yes.  But that's why I wanted -00 to have no semantics changes, so that we
could scan the diff and say, "yeah, that's all gratuitous" :-)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email