[dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70631A014A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 13:17:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ArTyK_vrkM1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 13:17:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D401A00B5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 13:17:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9770; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415135870; x=1416345470; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=zV6yZysloB7LPMPlsfQU9py2A5BPLQTET3L7K3vCBPc=; b=cxihgWlhbD00O+LK0MR3Pswix2x9rkUd7D16ngQ41V6Ymk9zMRUqFl3V URqHRx0aJh2L8bt2ZcIlC2Ag/Fb9zrOZmnCYGddvypgBACRmRemepABLc 3gu2swvPUimiMEV2O7XPqWpDj6dnvRzbvBTYNntJ2+dOauMRTtqAiG+vi 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlwFAL5BWVStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGVFgEzGmBdIdLAoEjFgEBAQEBcguEAgEBAQQtXgEZBAEBCx05FAkJAQQTCIg5DaYXpFUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGZBfNweDJ4EeBZIghE+IST2DD41JhAmDeGyBSIEDAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,314,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="369290656"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 21:17:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4LHlhD011549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 21:17:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.20]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:17:46 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02
Thread-Index: Ac/4c9d/c9OWXJctTSywC4nxKWsibw==
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:17:46 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B70A060@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.131.36.49]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B70A060xmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/G4WQ5D0-_Q1UYA9SK2cuEiHSXYU
Subject: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:17:52 -0000

Hi:

The WG chairs believe this document has sufficient support to move forward and there were no objections. There was one serious issue raised by Ted (Init-Reboot) and plenty of smaller nits reported, so a revised I-D will be needed.

The authors are requested to publish an updated draft, at which point we'll confirm that the reported issues have been addressed and then send on.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 10:14 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02 - Respond by Oct 27, 2014


Hi all,



This message starts the DHC working group last call to advance "Dynamic Allocation of Shared IPv4 Addresses", draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02, document as a Standards Track (Proposed Standard) RFC. The authors believe that this version is ready.



The draft is available here:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-02



Please send your comments by October 27th, 2014. If you do not feel this document should advance, please state your reasons why.



There are no IPR claims reported at this time.



Bernie Volz is the currently assigned shepherd for this document.



- Tomek & Bernie