[dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 22:18 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148711070864.9986.5446946904026153785.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:18:28 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/GkCN56iITuSt3NECH_NqgEsyr10>
Cc: dhc-chairs@ietf.org, volz@cisco.com, dhcwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm okay with the reasoning for the security considerations section, but
think it might be good if a general reference for security of DHCP was
listed as well.  Since an older RFC is referenced, any references from
that one might be out-of-date.

[dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… tianxiang li