[dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-07
Ajay Lele <ajay.lele@gmail.com> Thu, 14 October 2010 04:55 UTC
Return-Path: <ajay.lele@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9793A6A65 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nzr7b31vIfT for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2753A69EC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so8958899iwn.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jgtkw7nY+3w7Fog+3OerrKKXCFl4X4lP2tXdtN3fEfg=; b=NbcnZ4L21sbtPupLmLO20AQq+D1w/NUL9NcGb9il79GCjSdQ/afvwqYEgSVpJomxxg iOyFpmLakGRpULYQ2M5gt9AMKRQpqycfD1cnElVC/ECdFLBZLCqJgd/xtJAggNI5VrGb bEch8ggPmakYgJ9bNQ2KQ/QFsDFLq55qQZlgE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JlqUBkUaqWQzjsrXEqCOuP9YQZhy6ls0Y2daxfxgLrSLD9hKzcu0T1E8xArGW2U/Ri wHs9szTU9xfcED6LeaSG0Ooxlbm36/NssowQKt5jD7vTWyNG1iw3H1JY1F8gq/lZR/3+ pSkkLlB5EaxPQk6nC/y/+4bt2yV/mw6DELQUc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.169.69 with SMTP id a5mr3561430icz.427.1287032222631; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.205.210 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:57:02 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin=Ncoyb6N4iMpUYhTq64_-tuFRPyvBXU_jXkZt@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ajay Lele <ajay.lele@gmail.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba6e82a871c7fc04928c8a13"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:31:12 -0700
Subject: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-07
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:56:27 -0000
Hi Folks, This is regarding draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-07. I have been following this draft and the discussions that happened around it closely. Infact I had the opportunity to write a small prototype implementing this functionality (04 version) for the ISC DHCP server for an in-house project. I would like to voice my support for this draft to become a standard Regards Ajay