Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-mrugalski-softwire-dhcpv4-over-v6-option-01

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 08 October 2012 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D82221F871E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgBBguZwyIZ1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CB121F86B7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUHK3iqh2y4pNt1Q5EyaM7nojPG7OHLpA@postini.com; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 04:22:51 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E50D1B8315 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7D319005C; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:22:44 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-mrugalski-softwire-dhcpv4-over-v6-option-01
Thread-Index: AQHNpQsUHRuQdiKJx0iDvIP+Vk1kdpevubsA
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:22:44 +0000
Message-ID: <49EED9B7-DEA6-453D-9BDA-90FBD69E5583@nominum.com>
References: <EDE04BE3-EF07-4CD2-B8D9-D82A570E8C19@nominum.com> <93BA6FCE-4EAF-4F56-9E4F-B6E389834A41@nominum.com> <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA3CE36E96@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA3CE36E96@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1AA4A492CE07EA4483C6285C04A12428@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhcwg WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-mrugalski-softwire-dhcpv4-over-v6-option-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:22:52 -0000

On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> wrote:
> a. Schedule question: draft-mrugalski-softwire-dhcpv4-over-v6-option sounds work for the draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite per the section 2 of introduction, but draft-cui (LW4o6) is still in the status of individual draft. Is it suitable to adopt this draft after the (softwire) adoption of draft-cui?

No, it's actually for the dhcpv4-over-ipv6 draft.