RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information Option and RADIUS Attributes sub-option
"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 22 October 2004 22:48 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06650 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:48:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CL8Pc-0006xm-63 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:01:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CL7pK-0005HD-8n; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:24:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CL7Ab-0003Hn-Qh for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23603 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CL7NR-0002wi-D5 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:55:14 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2004 18:02:56 -0400
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9MLfIxT003311; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from volzw2k (che-vpn-cluster-2-248.cisco.com [10.86.242.248]) by flask.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id AMM74668; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
To: 'Wing Cheong Lau' <lau@qualcomm.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information Option and RADIUS Attributes sub-option
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:17 -0400
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <004301c4b87f$dcc8efd0$6501a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20041022092741.046dca70@qcmail1.qualcomm.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4939.300
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b045c2b078f76b9f842d469de8a32de3
Cc: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1745972218=="
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cdeeb24e6b743a852c396a4af0e53c8f
A very basic question ... why have a Relay Agent Information option and have sub-options inside this? And, especially 8-bit suboptions. It seems to me that with the larger 16-bit DHCPv6 option space, we'd just define an option to carry the "Radius Attributes" instead of placing this under a general "Relay Agent" option. The context of the message is pretty clear -- if it is from the relay, it can only be in a Relay-Forw (and Relay-Reply) message option area. There's also another advantage to this. Take the DHCPv4 subnet-selection option - there are two forms of this, one in for the relay agent and another for the client. This won't be necessary in DHCPv6 as the LOCATION of the message (either in the Client's Solicit, Request, ... or in a Relay-Forw/Relay-Reply) tells us who added it and which we'd prefer to use. This means only ONE option number is needed. So, I'd much rather see this specify a base option, OPTION-RADIUS-ATTRIBUTES, and have this contain the Radius attributes in the standard Radius encoding. So, it is just 16-bit option code, 16-bit length, followed by the radius encoding (as 8-bit suboptions). You can then specify that OPTION-RADIUS-ATTRIBUTES can only appear in the Relay-Forw (and Relay-Reply) message and MUST NOT appear in client messages themselves. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wing Cheong Lau Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:45 PM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information Option and RADIUS Attributes sub-option Dear all, We have submitted a new draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information Option and RADIUS Attributes sub-option last week. It's already available from the ietf site http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-droms-dhc-v6-relayopt-00.txt but I have not seen the official announcement so far. The draft basically carries over similar capabilities, namely, RFC 3046 and draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-08.txt from DHCPv4 to DHCPv6, with initial use cases targetting for the 3GPP2 environment. Comments are welcome. Regards, Wing Abstract This document introduces the capabilities of the DHCPv4 Relay Agent Information Option in RFC 3046 and the corresponding RADIUS- Attributes Sub-option to DHCPv6. In particular, the document describes a new DHCPv6 option called the Relay Agent Information option which extends the set of DHCPv6 options as defined in RFC 3315 and 3376. Following its DHCPv4 counterpart as defined in RFC 3046, the new option is inserted by the DHCPv6 relay agent when forwarding client-originated DHCPv6 packets to a DHCPv6 server. Servers recognizing the Relay Agent Information option may use the information to implement IP address or other parameter assignment policies. The DHCP Server echoes the option back verbatim to the relay agent in server-to-client replies, and the relay agent strips the option before forwarding the reply to the client. The Relay Agent Information option is organized as a single DHCPv6 option that contains one or more "sub-options" that convey information known by the relay agent. A RADIUS Attributes Sub-option, following its DHCPv4 counterpart, is also defined.
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information Opt… Wing Cheong Lau
- RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Information… Ted Lemon
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Bernie Volz
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Wing Cheong Lau
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Wing Cheong Lau
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Bernie Volz
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Kuntal Chowdhury
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Wing Cheong Lau
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Kuntal Chowdhury
- RE: RE: [dhcwg] New draft on DHCPv6 Relay Informa… Wing Cheong Lau