IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [dhcwg] RE: dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-01

"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Fri, 16 April 2004 02:59 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA21561 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:59:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BEJUG-0000z7-51 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:53:52 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3G2rqfu003779 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:53:52 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BEJPQ-0000Jt-RL for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:48:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA21237 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BEJPN-0003qb-Di for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:48:49 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BEJOV-0003nH-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:47:55 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BEJNq-0003je-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:47:14 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BEJKj-0007to-E0; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:44:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BEJHf-0007K9-Ak for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA20908 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BEJHb-0003M0-UI for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:48 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BEJGo-0003IC-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:39:59 -0400
Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BEJFq-0003A0-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:38:58 -0400
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout1.samsung.com by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HW80091QSO3JT@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:38:27 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp2 (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HW800MGQSNKUH@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:38:08 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HW8001VESNJ5M@mmp2.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:38:08 +0900 (KST)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:38:31 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] RE: dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-rapid-commit-opt-01
In-reply-to: <BFELJLKGHEJOPOPGJBKKMEKICIAA.steve@relicore.com>
To: 'Steve Gonczi' <steve@relicore.com>, 'Bernie Volz' <volz@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "'S. Daniel Park'" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Message-id: <01ad01c4235b$e8321950$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steve, thanks your valuable comments on the draft
during WGLC and kindly look my response inline.


- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. 

> How about:
> 
> "Since the Rapid Commit protocol provides no facilities to 
> prevent tying up
> multiple IPv4 addresses by multiple responding servers, deployments 
> SHOULD prevent multiple address commitments, relying on one 
> or more of the
> following options:
> 
> a) If possible, deploy the DHC load balancing protocol, or
> b) Allow a single Rapid Commit enabled server per site
> c) Provide a sufficiently large IP address pool 
> d) Employ sufficiently short Rapid Commit lease times
> 

I think the current draft already sufficiently described (b),(c),(d).
IMO, (a) is beyond our scope because it is a supplementary
method on the DHCP body not specific Rapid Commit issue.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email