RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK
"Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com> Tue, 03 February 2004 17:05 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18418 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:05:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3ye-0000F5-Fd for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:04:44 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i13H4iN3000924 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:04:44 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3ye-0000Ep-CF for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:04:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18384 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:04:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3yc-0000Zl-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:04:42 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3xZ-0000QF-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:03:37 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3wW-0000JG-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:02:32 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3w1-0008CR-QH; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:02:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3vZ-00083d-5M for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:01:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18196 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:01:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3vX-0000Cp-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:01:31 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3uc-00007n-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:00:35 -0500
Received: from chimera.incognito.com ([206.172.52.66]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3uM-00002G-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:00:18 -0500
Received: from homerdmz ([206.172.52.116] helo=HOMER.incognito.com.) by chimera.incognito.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ao3tp-00064I-00; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:59:45 -0800
Received: by homer.incognito.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <C772SNS7>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:59:40 -0800
Message-ID: <B34580038487494C8B7F36DA06160B870ABA20@homer.incognito.com>
From: "Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com>
To: "'Kevin A. Noll'" <kevin.noll@perfectorder.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:59:39 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3EA77.1C92DAE0"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
The client probably should drop the packet, and assume it's a malformed DHCP packet. I don't think a DECLINE is really appropriate here since this isn't even the same IP as what was OFFERed. The client can't really be sure that this was a valid DHCP transaction since it violates protocol.... -----Original Message----- From: Kevin A. Noll [mailto:kevin.noll@perfectorder.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:54 AM To: Kostur, Andre; Ted Lemon Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Yep, I understand this scenario. What I'm missing is if the client receives an ACK, but the ACKed IP is different than the OFFERed IP. Seems to me that the client should drop the ACK (like Ted suggests), or send a DHCPDECLINE. I just don't see any recommendation for this.
- RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Kostur, Andre
- RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Kevin A. Noll
- RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Kostur, Andre
- RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Kevin A. Noll
- RE: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Kostur, Andre
- Re: [dhcwg] Options differing in OFFER and ACK Ted Lemon