[dhcwg] 3315bis use of "requesting router" term
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 24 November 2016 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEEB12965F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:02:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_DTk9SogT74 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD5912952C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j65so56291749iof.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lG7s4wb5b08K3Xldy2juJi9Ol3fgfFF//NL3UYr42uY=; b=oE1pxoi5QpdrERK5E+x0RGPuN3mq24yAc9h98Vs0k3OW0qrf+zfO3Sppb0xZmikzy/ h3IQrCYnbQ68VrNwjn6xmVjIlRhYwNDws8ZjEXVYUho3pNCNKOl4FQ8NVGI5j+GEMejV ykeLp3pkMjnm1qAtTZM9ZPke4S4SOWS5bnTApT6u6LFdasVMHNl6V85oM7anSf9C5jkx B1VU9x7dIAynh2U4k62nJHEYeejuwxwq6zjbaUCPUHa5cgJxk7h/1A9z1pbBBgtXgNOc 8yuXGAUJoSBdhW3iv39GYPQpMkoWv1gEqxRc/CvfIccbFyFucfKdwYVlx7fE9JVuoxXR FOkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lG7s4wb5b08K3Xldy2juJi9Ol3fgfFF//NL3UYr42uY=; b=Qyc5FTi8qZJz0g4Ph7tNYiKbg/R6DApxS75DDVz25u2gLAZ2BeY+vGy3wdAKxfmYBv 3qNeVQUOITZlcciOI/mJxZmgq+Sd+5Zj/sLfGH5Oli9gtsjj7qdkQNxFZpQX43swQhpp CV/iYI3ghY7ZGc/Xi4TiM6I2J9v+cNXMn/Dis64LLtWJxitBhcbIHhLd5CZSkSnZPuZn 2NUSkNqu1encZbZqYejozKDWizjUfatXhJN5weI01dLnWrj3lrKWxPCC5SxbCmGl9H7c 0ggzzRd5X/x9Dt1yDd4MvgdpqJR2j0MWhshFXJSLgA8SeH9gRrILFeNWdLXQhDEHO4Vd fn2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01VaBhcFdteFBS2SdTCsXHnmUuIhcRyydJ74LI5DqlzQ+jMwZI/B5J1+VgZmdZrJtVUzBPvfn1p0q9Ov8VJ
X-Received: by 10.36.253.137 with SMTP id m131mr11565ith.115.1479952930246; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:02:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.18.160 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:01:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:01:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0ZtfKOe9Ut7hGpr_f=ahOSEEB8VAxmUk+rRu5uPoC4+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c11bf08b17ff00542026498"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/LUGPqBiF_xyL5NAg61TZavg95Rs>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dhcpv6bis@ietf.org" <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] 3315bis use of "requesting router" term
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 02:02:14 -0000
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote: > This version does NOT yet have ALL of the WGLC comments received over the > summer addressed - there were almost 300 of the them and we are probably > close to 3/4 done. (We also have a few issues in the issues tracker let to > resolve - see https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/report/1.) Hi, (Apologies if this was mentioned in Seoul - I couldn't make it due to a conflict.) I looked at the open issues discussion slides <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-dhcpv6bis-open-issues-discussion-01.pdf> and I saw it wasn't mentioned, so I thought I'd ask: what's the status of ticket #167 <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ticket/167> to change the term "requesting router" to "client"? Is this one of the issues the authors were planning to resolve? Since the ticket was opened, RFC 7934 was published as BCP and one of the options it recommends is to use DHCPv6 PD to assign prefixes to hosts, so I think this should be resolved before publication. Cheers, Lorenzo
- [dhcwg] 3315bis use of "requesting router" term Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] 3315bis use of "requesting router" te… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] 3315bis use of "requesting router" te… Lorenzo Colitti