Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-fang-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions-02 (Ends May 8, 2016)

Hi,

I did read this document (version 01) and give some comments before. I
think it is a useful solution and support it to be adopted.

Regards,
Linhui

2016-04-22 22:48 GMT+08:00 Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com>:

> Hi:
>
>
>
> At the IETF-95 DHC WG session, Luyuan Fang gave a presentation on
> draft-fang-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions-02 (Forcerenew Reconfiguration
> Extensions for DHCPv4) – see
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-dhc-6.pdf.
>
>
>
> There was a brief discussion about whether there was sufficient interest
> in the WG to take on this work and the conclusion was to take it to the
> list (which we would have needed to do anyway).
>
>
>
> So, we are starting an Adoption Call for this draft (
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions-02
> ).
>
>
>
> Please respond by May 8, 2016 whether you support having the WG take on
> this work. Please note that this means YOU need to be involved in resolving
> open issues, reading draft updates, and otherwise actively participating to
> move this work forward.
>
>
>
> The abstract from the draft is:
>
>
>
>    This document extends the definition of the DHCPFORCERENEW message
>
>    for parameter reconfiguration in DHCPv4. This extension makes the
>
>    DHCPFORCERENEW message more suitable to reconfigure configuration
>
>    parameters other than IP addresses, and aligns the behavior of the
>
>    reconfiguration procedure in DHCPv4 to the corresponding behavior in
>
>    DHCPv6.
>
>
>
> While not directly on the WG’s current charter, we have confirmed with our
> AD (Suresh) that this would be acceptable work for us to adopt (no
> re-chartering will be necessary).
>
>
>
> -          Tomek and Bernie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>