RE: [dhcwg] IPR claims for <draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-05.txt>

"Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com> Thu, 22 January 2004 18:51 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04174 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:51:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ajjuw-0007dG-Jt for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:51:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0MIp2J0029328 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:51:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ajjuw-0007cs-D9 for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:51:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04007 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:50:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ajjuu-00043c-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:51:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AjjtI-0003jf-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:49:21 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ajjs7-0003XK-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:48:07 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ajjs1-0007Fj-RS; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:48:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ajjr5-0007E5-05 for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:47:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03466 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:47:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ajjr2-0003SJ-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:47:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ajjq7-0003Qx-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:46:04 -0500
Received: from chimera.incognito.com ([206.172.52.66] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ajjpt-0003PQ-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:45:49 -0500
Received: from homerdmz ([206.172.52.116] helo=HOMER.incognito.com.) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AjjpN-0004Vm-00 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:45:17 -0800
Received: by homer.incognito.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <C772R1TP>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:45:11 -0800
Message-ID: <B34580038487494C8B7F36DA06160B870AB93A@homer.incognito.com>
From: "Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] IPR claims for <draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-05.txt>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:45:10 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3E117.DD058610"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60

I'm curious.  Their original notification was on April 17th.... and their
notification is filled with "may obtain" and "to be filed in the future".
To date, does anybody know if they have obtained and/or actually filed for
the patents (and other IPR)?

Also, have they mentioned what their reasonable and non-discriminatory
licencing requirements are?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Gonczi [mailto:steve@relicore.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:03 AM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [dhcwg] IPR claims for
> <draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-05.txt>
> 
> 
> I second Ted's motion. 
> 
> I find it especially troublesome that these claims are disclosed
> relatively late in the game.
> 
> My personal preference would be not to put any time/effort into 
> reviewing any draft with attached IPR claims.
> 
> /sG
> 
> PS. The opinions voiced here are mine. 
> My employer has nothing to do with it.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org]On 
> Behalf Of Ted
> Lemon
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:17 PM
> To: Ralph Droms
> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IPR claims for
> <draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-05.txt>
> 
> 
> >This is really unfortunate.   I think the right thing to do at this 
> >point is for the WG to put these two drafts on hold (that is, remove 
> >them from consideration and put tombstones on them on the IETF FTP 
> >site) until this patent issue is resolved.