Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option
Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no> Tue, 24 October 2006 21:01 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcTOP-0007XE-7i; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:01:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcTOO-0007TT-0E for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:01:00 -0400
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no ([2001:700:1::eecb]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcTOD-00071l-O0 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:00:59 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tyholt.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376F87C71; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:00:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tyholt.uninett.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08471-01-9; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:00:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6?2001?700?1?1100?205?4eff?fe40?1762] (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:1:1100:205:4eff:fe40:1762]) by tyholt.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB0B87BF5; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:00:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <453E7EFA.7010408@uninett.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:00:42 +0100
From: Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060612)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option
References: <7a43017b0610230802j8b1e8a8i4d3550dff119322d@mail.gmail.com> <453E05D5.3070008@cisco.com> <453E0AB8.3090806@uninett.no> <7a43017b0610240953r19bd7d98r3c8bb8e47f9bb290@mail.gmail.com> <453E79A4.5060207@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <453E79A4.5060207@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at uninett.no
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Eliot Lear wrote: > Giuseppe, > >> What's wrong in receiving LDAP directory information while in Sun? > > Because (a) I might not be entitled to it and (b) I might only want the > LDAP information I was previously getting for my own company or service, > especially with certain mailers that entirely hide the email address and > only list display names. So put yourself in the place of an OS vendor. > What should the default be? To take the information or not? If you > take it perhaps something gets misdirected. If you don't take it, then > the administrator has to touch the device anyway for bootstrap, in which > case the problem is different. > > On the other hand: > >> I'm in this situation, I'll provide as an example: I'm an admin of an >> organization of 100.000 desktops plus 50.000 roaming laptops. How >> should I configure automatically each laptop to find the closest ldap >> replica, without forcing to query the LDAP of its country ? > > I am sympathetic to your point. The reason I didn't recommend a > different approach was because I don't know of one that exists that > scales to the size of the Internet. I'm not exactly sure what the scenario is, but the idea is that the organisation has several sites around the world, a laptop is visiting one of these sites and should use the organisations closest LDAP server? I'm assuming it is at one of the sites, else I don't see how DHCP could be used to tell you what LDAP server to use. First thing that comes to my mind is to use SRV based on the laptop's domain name unless configured otherwise. Assuming DNS responds the same independent of where you are, I see two options. One is as I mentioned, that you contact one of the replicas listed in the SRV, and that it might give you an LDAP referral to a more appropriate replica based on your address. Another approach might be to use anycast. Have all the replicas share an address (in addition to having unique addresses), and make sure that at all locations, there is always exactly one that is the closest (according to your routing). Stig > > Eliot > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Giuseppe Paternò (Gippa)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Stig Venaas
- Fwd: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Giuseppe Paternò (Gippa)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Eliot Lear
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Giuseppe Paternò (Gippa)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Eliot Lear
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Stig Venaas
- RE: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Giuseppe Paternò (Gippa)
- RE: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option David W. Hankins
- RE: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] Proposal for experimental DHCP option Bud Millwood