RE: [dhcwg] [Question]DHCPv6 implementations

"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 25 June 2004 12:42 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA26984; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BdpzL-0005n3-B4; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:39:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bdpwe-0004x4-GS for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:36:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA26583 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bdpwd-00014c-M8 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:36:39 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Bdpvg-0000kF-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:35:41 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Bdpum-0000Ln-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:34:44 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2004 05:38:04 +0000
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i5PCYASc011979; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 05:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from volzw2k (che-vpn-cluster-2-2.cisco.com [10.86.242.2]) by flask.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id AJS04347; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "'strates'" <strates@mail.ru>, <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] [Question]DHCPv6 implementations
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:34:08 -0400
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <001001c45ab0$b621f840$6601a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.5709
In-Reply-To: <1489.040621@mail.ru>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4939.300
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There's also http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of strates
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 6:09 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] [Question]DHCPv6 implementations
> 
> 
> I tried to learn what are nowdays available DHCPv6 
> client/server implementations. Using the search engines I 
> could only find
> - KAME implementation for *BSDs: stateless DHCPv6, and they 
> are not going to improve it
> - Widespread linux-related http://dhcpv6.sourceforge.net 
> implementation
> - Some traces of proprietary CISCO IOS and NEC 
> implementations (http://www.dhcpv6.org/ with only relay agent 
> available for public)
> - USAGI implementation which leads to a project which claimed 
> himself 'dead'(http://www.linux-ipv6.org/links.html ->
> http://www.hycomat.co.uk/dhcp/)
> - Signs of some Linux implementation (there is some gentoo 
> related stuff, config files in google).
> - DHCPv6 support in HP-UX
> 
> It is quite strange for me, that only a few incomplete 
> implementations are present (yes, stateless IPv6 
> autoconfiguration fulfils a lot of work instead of DHCPv6, 
> and many people seem to be satisfied with s-less 
> autoconfiguration and router prefix advertisement, but 
> still...) Later I found www.dfn.de/uploaded/DHCPv6.pdf and I 
> understood that it seems there are really only a few 
> implementations. Could anybody advertise anything in addition 
> to the list above? Thanks beforehand
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg