[dhcwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- general:
I understand this to be a way for a third party to "actively" monitor
client DHCPv6 bindings.  Does that warrant some privacy considerations?

-- section 8.2:
The selection of secure vs insecure mode MAY be administratively
selectable. It seems like there should a stronger requirement for an
administrative option to force secure mode.