RE: [dhcwg] <draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection-03.txt> - Clas sfull ?

"Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se> Thu, 10 October 2002 13:04 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02128 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:04:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9AD62G08559 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:06:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9AD62v08556 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:06:02 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02100 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9AD3Qv08453; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:03:26 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9ACxRv08287 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:59:27 -0400
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01800 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mr5.exu.ericsson.se (mr5u3.ericy.com [208.237.135.124]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9ACxCj09558; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:59:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from eamrcnt761.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt761.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.39]) by mr5.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9ACxCe04275; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:59:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by eamrcnt761.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <41PAQK64>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:59:12 -0500
Message-ID: <F9211EC7A7FED4119FD9005004A6C8700AAD90FD@eamrcnt723.exu.ericsson.se>
From: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
To: "'Van Aken Dirk'" <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>, "'Ted Lemon'" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Cc: "'dhcwg@ietf.org'" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Dedecker Hans <DedeckerH@thmulti.com>, Dekeyser Miek <DekeyserM@thmulti.com>, "'Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be'" <Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] <draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection-03.txt> - Clas sfull ?
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:59:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2705C.84E25DC8"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

There is no need to do this. What's the benefit?

You'd have to configure the relay agent with more information than it currently
needs. (While in many cases the relay is probably a router and has this
information, why is it needed?) The server can figure out the subnet without
the prefix because the server needs both the address and subnet mask length for
all of the subnets (at least those it will be allocating addresses on).

Also, what happens if the server and relay agent disagree on the subnet mask
length? Suppose you wrongly configured the relay to send 20.0.0.0/23 and the
server is configured with 20.0.0.0/24?

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Van Aken Dirk [mailto:VanAkenD@thmulti.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:16 AM
To: 'Ted Lemon'
Cc: 'dhcwg@ietf.org'.org'; Dedecker Hans; Dekeyser Miek;
'Dirk.Ooms@alcatel.be'
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] <draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection-03.txt> -
Clas sfull ?


Hi Ted,

As you as you mentioned in the reply, it is indeed exactly the same problem
as with giaddr.

But why can this problem not be solved ? After all, the overloading of
giaddr (communication with the relay agent and address pool selection) was
defined 17 years ago (RFC951-1985). All networks were classfull at that time
but today almost all IP systems can operate in a classless environment..

As it is a totally new DHCP Relay Information Sub-Option, one can easily
define two fields: IP address and IP mask or IP address and Prefix length.

One could eventually reuse the syntax of <draft-ietf-dhc-csr-07.txt> - The
Classless Static Route Option for DHCPv4.

Best regards - Dirk

                     

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
Sent: Tuesday 8 October 2002 11:32
To: Van Aken Dirk
Cc: 'dhcwg@ietf.org'.org'; Dedecker Hans; Dekeyser Miek
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] <draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection-03.txt> -
Classfull ?


> I wonder though how the DHCP server can derive a subnet from a single
> quantity being an IP address. e.g. 20.0.0.0 can be an alias for 
> 20.0.0.0/8
> or 20.0.0.0/29.
> So my guess is that the only way the DHCP server can derive the subnet 
> form
> is based on the leading bits of the address being either class A, B or 
> C.

The DHCP server is configured with a list of subnets.   It has to be, 
to make address assignment decisions.

This is exactly the same problem that you have if you use giaddr for 
subnet selection.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg