IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01 - respond by May 9th

" Yihao " <yhjia03@foxmail.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <yhjia03@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583C5120006 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNpm8DcbcLQv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 04:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgbr2.qq.com (smtpbgbr2.qq.com [54.207.22.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DC1120020 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 04:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1557402942; bh=Fd+9v0ZCa964/dAEEevUo9L9pwXMyRX5/RhCql+NjxA=; h=From:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Date:Message-ID; b=k3FcWJKjHQlcqcIVjOo64Y8d5/kJWDkrTLEAFdyUwyN/XSQLRXng2ieCEJLWj+XUD 5/LF48hwmPFSylQOxSCrD7tK1VrQHeRk74nELnYM9A234LM/DGcYcX4xolTa0L/7i6 30RHn5qnIxmCMc2247d2jZqv1gpFXWaIYaLstFl4=
X-QQ-FEAT: SEAS9eHRDwQwwW8g4dGY45DRWdQkV5rKbXwOzw1QfI32ZBE4FC/J/jg3xFS2c z9lI48G1zv8Li7d4gUGWASVVDUiXrniJgIFr6efHoeDv5x+Z/BWoc5k5FMOZq5cdNqPMoq7 EFQyZYrD9JTzbqNSL79yT/ttGZHmPQ3VjAV6WnjObHfiNMDJjIj64aGgd6IQmGFTajkyVEz iMGBDaX0wnAbyTtH3lHrNjiIUlW5PIdfwHHmcsOcovL0anzwOxMM7lTQ8C10jYMR7fvgyiD VzGOnEVdWg0oCP
X-QQ-SSF: 000000000000004000000000000000Z
X-HAS-ATTACH: no
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-Originating-IP: 183.173.200.243
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webmail452t1557402942t2100354
From: Yihao <yhjia03@foxmail.com>
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_5CD4153E_0C7AFDD8_05142CDE"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:55:42 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_F71C7BF785932CC9632E5FAF464D6245B808@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Received: from qq.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id ; Thu, 09 May 2019 19:55:42 +0800 (CST)
Feedback-ID: webmail:foxmail.com:bgforeign:bgforeign2
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/O8vKktOW5HQl-FC-9I2k9mhlPbo>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01 - respond by May 9th
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 11:55:55 -0000

I support to adopt this document.
The topic is meaningful for network management, and I think it shows some potential for complicated but dedicated address-based authorization scenario.


Thanks,
Yihao

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email