Re: [dhcwg] Should triggered-reconfigure define a new DHCP message header format?

[Bud Millwood <[e-mail]>]

> b) An alternative reading of "continue the RFC3315 convention" is
> to consider the existing fixed-length message headers defined
> in RFC3315 as the headers that you should use unless you
> *really* need another fixed length message header, and to use
> options in the *existing* 3315-defined message headers.

This sums it up for me. I'll happily add a new message format if
that's where it really belongs, but if seems to belong in the context
of an existing message in any way then it should be an option.

Anything that doesn't throw away messages it doesn't understand is an
accident waiting to happen.

- Bud