Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm
Huan Huan <shawngespan@gmail.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 01:12 UTC
Return-Path: <shawngespan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0EA21F8673 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEMpEs3V+0Jb for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1532421F8671 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkuw12 with SMTP id w12so549157bku.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RmINf0ntWm35IBYap8zlVPiO/GaY4fzAzKtrQeRn3M8=; b=WH7DTDipczDHeVhylV0IlVvjC3EBa9W6xj0ObaYFI7YypzxWRKti+zviFiibU4RkU7 z5EExXD9dRAzsx5LhLQEgZ5Ec/J8CTdawfMrktQo2bQbiNwGs+VGuBxI6PQIZe3coT/4 h5mbwiuzw6bBob1YY0haPMso11ejVIBRPoCZk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.129.208 with SMTP id p16mr10697410bks.131.1329268360166; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.81.8 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:12:40 +0800
Message-ID: <CAByx+R0h5VFROEVfHG12eAN9gHefDp4P4yK_m=UNQSZ_R7YQcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Huan Huan <shawngespan@gmail.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org, twinters@iol.unh.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00151747ba066b3b6604b8f668ab"
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:12:44 -0000
Hi Tim, I think CE Router may transmit Confirm msg containing the assigned IA_NA and Renew msg containing the assigned IA_PD separately. BR, Huan 2012/2/15 <dhcwg-request@ietf.org> > If you have received this digest without all the individual message > attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list > subscription. To do so, go to > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get > MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option > globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. > > > > Send dhcwg mailing list submissions to > dhcwg@ietf.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dhcwg-request@ietf.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dhcwg-owner@ietf.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dhcwg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-04.txt > (internet-drafts@ietf.org) > 2. DHCP Renew vs Confirm (Timothy Winters) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:40:41 -0800 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org > Subject: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-04.txt > Message-ID: <20120214104041.23040.30559.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration > Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Forcerenew Nonce Authentication > Author(s) : David Miles > Wojciech Dec > James Bristow > Roberta Maglione > Filename : draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-04.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2012-02-14 > > Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) FORCERENEW allows for the > reconfiguration of a single host by forcing the DHCP client into a > Renew state on a trigger from the DHCP server. In Forcerenew Nonce > Authentication the server sends a nonce to the client on the initial > DHCP ACK that is used for subsequent validation of a FORCERENEW > message. This document updates RFC 3203. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-04.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-04.txt > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:43:50 -0500 > From: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> > To: dhcwg@ietf.org > Subject: [dhcwg] DHCP Renew vs Confirm > Message-ID: <C0CA95B6-1743-4D37-9BCC-D104453EBF9A@iol.unh.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hello, > While testing some CE Router implementations we have noticed a > interesting behavior that is within the specifications but not clearly > documented. I wanted to get the working group thoughts on this. > > Currently when a CE Router acting as a DHCP client, assigned both > IA_NA and IA_PD, is unplugged from the network. When reattached to the > link the DHCP client transmits a DHCP Renew containing both the IA_NA and > the IA_PD. > > 3315 Section 18.1.2 says that when link goes down a DHCP client > implementation should transmit a DHCP Confirm message containing the > assigned IA_NA. > > 3633 Section 12.1 doesn't allow the use of the Confirm message. It > states that DHCP Renew message, containing the assigned IA_PD, should be > used when the link goes down. > > According to the specifications a DHCP client should retransmit > DHCP Confirm and DHCP Renew when link goes up. The behavior we are seeing > is the DHCP client transmits a DHCP renew containing both the IA_NA and > IA_PD. > > This behavior isn't causing interoperability issues as all the > servers we have tried still respond properly to the DHCP Renew messages. > > Is it ok when a DHCP client loses link for it to transmit one DHCP > Renew message? > > Regards, > Tim > UNH-IOL > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > End of dhcwg Digest, Vol 94, Issue 13 > ************************************* > -- Huan Huan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Timothy Winters
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Huan Huan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Huan Huan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Timothy Winters
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Huan Huan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Jean-Francois.TremblayING
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Ole Trøan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Huan Huan
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confirm Bernie Volz (volz)
- [dhcwg] 答复: Re: dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs Confi… shawngespan
- Re: [dhcwg] 答复: Re: dhcwg Digest, DHCP Renew vs C… Ted Lemon