IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] FW: New VersionNotification for draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-authorization-opt-00.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDF121F8702 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Lv6VlPW+18i for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C1721F842E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT3L9wlo1vuKn10HB8hEMKv9cCmqFOfQK@postini.com; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:10 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04D11B811B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D91F190064; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:02:09 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] FW: New VersionNotification for draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-authorization-opt-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNDNXkeyBo8/ocaEWMyurXscwD7ZZ/mzk0
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:02:07 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307472D1C76@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA218D0B71@SZXEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307472D0C15@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>, <B5E4EA0D-48CA-4667-AC35-C7D254304F2F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B5E4EA0D-48CA-4667-AC35-C7D254304F2F@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] FW: New VersionNotification for draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-authorization-opt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:02:34 -0000

> I fully agree. I had always thought it good if we had a v6 equivalent
> of RFC 4014. Jusy a container for comminicating a subset of the
> RADIUS attributes would work very well.

That's not actually what I was suggesting, but okay.

The main issue with this draft, though, is a simple one: is this the right architecture to solve the problem described in the introduction?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email