[dhcwg] Timezone draft: some comments from shane
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 09 August 2006 16:45 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GArBN-0006lS-9R; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:45:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GArBM-0006lN-QK for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:45:24 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GArBL-000652-Cr for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:45:24 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2006 09:45:15 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.08,107,1154934000"; d="scan'208"; a="335177181:sNHT2285940304"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k79GjEJ2004278 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:45:14 -0700
Received: from imail.cisco.com (sjc12-sbr-sw3-3f5.cisco.com [172.19.96.182]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k79GjEVP015504 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [212.254.247.6] (ams3-vpn-dhcp4477.cisco.com [10.61.81.124]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k79GbVsv002658 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:37:32 -0700
Message-ID: <44DA111B.7030405@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:45:15 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DHCP discussion list <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080402030600020801000801"
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 44 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=4580; t=1155141914; x=1156005914; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:Timezone=20draft=3A=20some=20comments=20from=20shane; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DwO2myuX7rqNxF6a2GwlKGU1vXwU=3D; b=CQWf+E6YSphoXDz2HNebSf+sJsvw4MP28LtQHTQxwF2/+PiuclCxRA4DF2KwPSxgL4FTCyp1 N2HmHLC/S3JXA74DLyYSKILB2FMDeNNk6tgmvR4jz/LVD42sBlhJ6AVN;
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3a4bc66230659131057bb68ed51598f8
Subject: [dhcwg] Timezone draft: some comments from shane
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Regarding the attached message, assuming no objections the authors will make the changes recommended by Shane. Eliot
--- Begin Message --------BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : A Timezone Option for DHCP > Author(s) : E. Lear, P. Eggert > Filename : draft-ietf-dhc-timezone-option-02.txt > Pages : 10 > Date : 2006-7-18 > Minor nit: You should probably use the same text to describe the contents of the DHCP and DHCPv6 options. So either: - - "IEEE 1003.1 String" or "TZ POSIX String" - - "Reference to the TZ Database" or "TZ Database String" I prefer the second, because it is used later in the text where they are described. Minor suggestion: In the section on deprecation, I find the following text confusing: Implementations of the time offset IPv4 option SHOULD implement this option as well. Others SHOULD instead implement this option. Perhaps something like: "Current implementations that support the time offset IPv4 option SHOULD implement this option also. Other implementations SHOULD implement this option, and SHOULD NOT implement the time offset IPv4 option." The draft looks very good! :) - -- Shane -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvUhrMsfZxBO4kbQRAkIvAKCEaOgr+02WTinAIQl6nD4JMcki7gCfcPgX 9aAdwQtcx2lxTNTiy943ZcY= =b+4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-------- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg