IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 - Respond by Jan 30, 2020

Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com> Thu, 16 January 2020 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E78B12085E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWnQA23tL3Iv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E384120882 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id v69so16632591ili.10 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZYJlTX+yhb3hzggbH8J4zm0LpyFdli2xSt0NmhqV/0o=; b=VGVi+yRu7upKlb0O7cPJWfyf8J++CWLmRwgxM6L5TyH/7UdD9+lHF4+8y/fR5MZTVt MJj/oMTRu3m4luta7uuwT+4B0+im/pbzpG1OrN5BW0nAIUZ7X2grqi6Xso8+DPJqVMva v7gqLpVH5uJMEdsx6WTI5vwt81AWxsNO7OldXPCOXWdD9IQjOIqD1WFH1LDDRIvKx+m5 xKAr/6NJCW7R3NFHPE6bVRCu36F2ikEkMgyHtam7Qro1oVXPGMsRgK+gxz/+y5GQ4BsE wSBTHXU0mlhiZKVuBrmhawt9gUNfEyv8XaM0f2/+IBwUVXwH1yqr79MZMJ562gVFKkkE 8vlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZYJlTX+yhb3hzggbH8J4zm0LpyFdli2xSt0NmhqV/0o=; b=IGe/mNa5fia3aiE88pokl8MZt6LlT4WLuBDlvbYJFMpFL8JFIIMoDyIWRyvZkrhefu HYNcuXUXpRpU1skjxFjho3UHLRXziTM4D9FdBYBKm+/nVckbZ6L+X6aVUk/N8WeysvF6 Y2nwAgL4gCuD7cIjqxs5P7JrjezdMoGM/ZXSqGNvKJO/bvBiKEwXS/xYwuf9Cg/wxaYP jxDAh3JyWel38Qtftkkqi2Ov3ILiJ/QAA4mdoupqvdCv3mCcAixx42/depapsys+dAiC Q5qDJn1yp1Hi9xtiJLPr3OPuTwh0449eQlw9xeewLkBAn0tMOA4RT1T1Up4Q9Ns8UoB3 5raQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVV/rgUgPnLWuzgPgo668VT8NbntHhV+0ioApPKY3e4XeXKfSEE FSYrN5FesS+ZW6nkkNsIzLVAimUnBbSqVTArnlk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwJErqFQTSWgwTiffnpVV0hH0d3d19H3ETw98BDzffiSqkXiVsx/Hznw51xLxUBzWCUcZElCR8QNXWDDYNtl8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d7c6:: with SMTP id g6mr1273982ilq.282.1579137619421; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR11MB28887B0F507EFB03063B2C0DCF370@BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB28887B0F507EFB03063B2C0DCF370@BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:20:07 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGGiuEYamh9LLJhgE+VBeWBwmZf9KfdbL-qTBaBCbY3uvUqJfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db7005059c37a084"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/RRUxJI4qj-1alzk8IVgnRrZMVug>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 - Respond by Jan 30, 2020
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:20:22 -0000

Chairman,


CPNR in the document says , extension development shall be from Cisco or
user of its products to extend the specific app?


ISP as the dhcpv6 servers offer would cooperate such *.ext?


Older OS like vista, started dhcpv6 first entering new OS dhcpv6 second
one, the relay or forwarding need this sort of extension to assist keep
well all enterity from ISP or and Cisco together?


Sincerely
Li HUANG



On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 05:56 Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello:
>
>
>
> The authors have requested a WGLC for
> draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv (DHCPv6 Extension Survey and
> Considerations)..
>
>
>
> Please review this document and provide your comments and whether you
> support the document moving forward or not, by January 30th, 2020 (23:59
> UTC).
>
>
>
> Please see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv.
> This is an Informational document.
>
>
>
> There are no IPR notices filed against this work (as of this writing).
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>    - Tomek & Bernie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email