IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 - Respond by Jan 30, 2020

何林 <helin1170@gmail.com> Fri, 31 January 2020 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <helin1170@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCF1120104; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.746
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8g_GeUzedLlI; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AD71200F9; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4so3547675pgd.6; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=xnf5ZaHN2x1CdkvX80fd4ypbMC5A8dT7XKUilsHojLs=; b=YlvVNYBeYHqayLEEbR1mRjthDXF8p4XNKnxBqOJG54VGzm56WmTILyOq5RilDfL6/y 8R18SLKKwHc5NuZkxlFwfvz60TRQ5ImTRB04wMjFWYs3hjr5A8pq1kEGbyGrB0wMj0GQ K3cfXNEKusEdJ6FvKBedqFnO++tF4gY1NJAoq4QjtgmARuMQw1AE/AO7WVkSWO9VUjSJ 99fgfjlj553CuKsESaykRZUmNk5b6eSoJaQ7TY0qDH5DLBse8x/i26LMJKxOGcvI6wA6 Pzg1mhVvjJnZtMXxW5PYSIAby0U730UaWSXPO7FSaVFYrUESX31nsx8M7IUJ0F/jfxWf RSXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=xnf5ZaHN2x1CdkvX80fd4ypbMC5A8dT7XKUilsHojLs=; b=cF7PyuiUMopFw1MijSWT3gX7opwQOgDYkUZCR1f9qEo6kt1WzlwjE7sgmJp9sIpOwH RkDoUXhdLmlGVOmyS3rZvOrREwQBxdTe3EuEE5pmsYnKDRcDAj+lUt9Pj1aMa3rqk7Qk palLanGbWmViCyutJjH8G6v3EL1/RxRBDhhzG+kZDp5uUcn0KbeiGhNUG1+FjBH4OM+q zesmpHhhXW9iy1OBDDJ340DiHI3hYh3eYL8Qq2kVMMBwXaiB7VsyEhA/9R9S5M41Uit6 /S07kIUPIGodwt3Tlfh65PDXrralfJPw03omM2opIq7VDCE0U7ahfNAIgjv+Z5RGBzvw iscQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9W708nwZDeat9fcSRheQVR0LeaqKsTcWbgVgJZUvA6H/OS+Pn dOumwH5zHU7XroCm51Oy7JqR/VqZsuc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwY7AqKkuPHXyUp2JdJtt93uvXdhhByQKTNrlhdJbOHKixHUsZI8HxNN5H5YWvkUWAlZ1+/lA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2a07:: with SMTP id q7mr10886029pfq.153.1580480891916; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2408:84e1:c8:ef56:b472:6e3b:b6f:2db? ([2408:84e1:c8:ef56:b472:6e3b:b6f:2db]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm10331775pgh.35.2020.01.31.06.28.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-2D8826A3-2E77-4657-8F0B-8719FEB7CF29"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: 何林 <helin1170@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 22:28:03 +0800
Message-Id: <C48E4BC8-1578-4891-AF08-16B018A1D053@gmail.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB28880801E99138BD0D3A7DD3CF050@BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB28880801E99138BD0D3A7DD3CF050@BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/HMJ9Wjs3ezTJAy6gm4P3i7PvWI4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 - Respond by Jan 30, 2020
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:28:17 -0000

Hi, Bernie!

Thanks for your valuable comments!

We will address the reference issue and update the document.

More input and review are welcome! Thanks!

Sincerely,

Lin He

> On Jan 30, 2020, at 4:31 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi:
>  
> As document shepherd, I did review and it seems to be in order as to the shepherd review criteria with one exception - all references are normative. This should be reconsidered – see https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/ for more on this issue. This may be less critical for Informational documents, but I think it will be a red flag for the IESG. Those references that are “for example” cases, should be moved to Informational. The document is also a bit wordy.
>  
> As shepherd, I do believe that the document can move forward after review/update of the references issue is addressed. And, that it does provide some useful information for administrators as to potential capabilities of servers that they may want to consider based on their needs.
>  
> More input and review would definitely be beneficial, as the interest and discussion level of this document has been on the low side. However, as it is an Informational, and not a Standards Track, document, the bar can be a bit lower.
>  
> Bernie
>  
> From: dhcwg <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 4:56 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 - Respond by Jan 30, 2020
>  
> Hello:
>  
> The authors have requested a WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv (DHCPv6 Extension Survey and Considerations)...
>  
> Please review this document and provide your comments and whether you support the document moving forward or not, by January 30th, 2020 (23:59 UTC).
>  
> Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv. This is an Informational document.
>  
> There are no IPR notices filed against this work (as of this writing).
>  
> Thank you!
>  
> Tomek & Bernie
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email