Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finished with WGLC
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 25 March 2009 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D129B3A6D85 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.341
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.341 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXGQVLvTqpfQ for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.69]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57153A68AB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (slb-av-01.boeing.com [129.172.13.4]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/8.14.0/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id n2PJxMSD007991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n2PJxMj5025094; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.55.84]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n2PJxL0r025080; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.54.35]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:20 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:18 -0700
Message-ID: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105BB4F5E@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <6BB83B63-CC55-47A8-9204-3AF4072F2D4F@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finished with WGLC
Thread-Index: Acmtfe7juaKjOReZScW7V0SAZC91kwABgo4A
References: <20090311204501.D0D4B28C158@core3.amsl.com> <FDE67292-AC3F-49C2-BBB4-12F67E085D6B@cisco.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105BB4E0F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <6BB83B63-CC55-47A8-9204-3AF4072F2D4F@cisco.com>
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Richard Johnson <raj@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2009 19:59:20.0868 (UTC) FILETIME=[2FF58E40:01C9AD84]
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finished with WGLC
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:58:40 -0000
Richard, I like the spirit of what you are saying; if the lawyers agreed, that would make me feel even better. But, I don't think any of this should hold up publication - any other opinions? Fred fred.l.templin@boeing.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Johnson [mailto:raj@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:14 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; dhc Chairs; draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finished with WGLC > > The IPR for this is the same as the standard Cisco IPR; basically, > "don't sue us and we won't sue you" is my understanding, and it's > always been that way. I could contact our Cisco lawyers and have then > try to clarify it more, if that would help. > > /raj > > > On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > > AFAICT, the IPR will still be there whether/not this > > document actually publishes as an RFC. I would still > > appreciate clarification on the IPR, but I cannot see > > that holding up publication - does anyone else see it > > differently? > > > > Fred > > fred.l.templin@boeing.com > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Richard Johnson [mailto:raj@cisco.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:38 PM > >> To: dhcwg@ietf.org WG > >> Cc: dhc Chairs; draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc@tools.ietf.org > >> Subject: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finished with > >> WGLC > >> > >> Unless I'm missing something, the Subnet Allocation draft has been > >> through WG LC at least 3 times and with this last revision, this last > >> time actually received sufficient reviews that I think we can call it > >> done and *finally* move on? > >> > >> /raj > >> > >> > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >>> From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > >>> Date: March 11, 2009 1:45:01 PM PDT > >>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >>> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org > >>> Subject: [dhcwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt > >>> Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org > >>> > >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >>> directories. > >>> This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working > >>> Group of the IETF. > >>> > >>> Title : Subnet Allocation Option > >>> Author(s) : R. Johnson, J. Kumarasamy, K. Kinnear, M. > > Stapp > >>> Filename : draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt > >>> Pages : 32 > >>> Date : 2009-3-11 > >>> > >>> This document defines a new DHCP option which is passed between the > >>> DHCP Client and the DHCP Server to request dynamic allocation of a > >>> subnet, give specifications of subnet(s) allocated, and report > > usage > >>> statistics. This memo documents the current usage of the option > > in > >>> agreement with [RFC3942], which declares that any pre-existing > >>> usages > >>> of option numbers in the range 128 - 223 should be documented and > >>> the > >>> working group will try to officially assign those numbers to those > >>> options. > >>> > >>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > >>> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt > >>> > >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >>> > >>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > >>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > >>> Internet-Draft.
- [dhcwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09… Internet-Drafts
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt finish… Richard Johnson
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt fi… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt fi… Richard Johnson
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-09.txt fi… Templin, Fred L