IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-04 - DUID representation in the model

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 15 December 2017 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A220126579 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwpNfEeTm6zR for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4D6128ACA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id d66so10232013qkg.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=80xpFVtl7x9vicUJIY8pQZotwRhHS3ce5gXMffpAYJA=; b=h/Py/X6M8aY88yppJPfMQ8D3CA+Vt04VvQHTqHvcDKoO1la95iysdKxxk5wapfFNyq T4Mu/pOUruyZbS3WlJlDanYehGWAzVea8kas++UrFjUpIgj1fqY2edqTjyIcegpczrLb RaQg2bxAhp810zj9xb2ivx+GWqUm1zVPOAnV+t5fiBd0r6WLYEfSW+ycNHWLzCFy2zBP c2H9PULTtS6GzC/yxCf0NhV6+cDMQPggWX3KNxMPu54a0lL1Q6pZ8nY6DKIfhcP42Dv+ 1BjTJ0+Djfs4joCOVJPBerOwPYalfyQRFDyo3QvlhFo8Xk2Oz+AjCSFTC5yIKV9P0gDJ jleQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=80xpFVtl7x9vicUJIY8pQZotwRhHS3ce5gXMffpAYJA=; b=XisqKw0CT8UQuSMjbUq7gDYKL/XLXVF9xk53ZApO83A6qFudZW9ppgXmRP0MzdSi0m jnBdoFO2kxOnj+oLXNHOWc9NSKgGLS1IGWqoccsW45HDmOiTC01Lct2+UVvoJxtJhySA wPmWFdQWUGNfqqA4y+feX9+RnhEd3saVHo3EKe01I0IPlg+vmKRvwjN6yxjH89zRSkcq TpXA7jzPoSbFCGDANqkmRElncv2jYyjkma47QwIBq7b2C6l7aSSDeZ1EWGq6CpHsla3v EEJ6b+GlPMuzGNsLS6hNkW3ajnM4SShzWc4bIRJqvqPAh73tbUMw9TXmVkl8jSKoVqnu MgGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK5khHI8MaUQyJCL5RHoIjfO7EPdMBOO1a37jQaNIjyCoDljPcV sEJWITdKqXb+ljQEgV4Dddlp+/R8QEA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos16cL2rrRZykvEqrYwJux/3UgrWPepSuX4UXXO2qpGzJD2p5dsvGI/RO7sIy3qnjI55vrqWA==
X-Received: by 10.55.200.129 with SMTP id t1mr20804975qkl.198.1513342936748; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm4089356qtf.82.2017.12.15.05.02.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E27B1DEB-E089-4340-8676-40F50934D6BF@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65EC3FD7-68CA-4DA8-8DC5-F7E45A5EC995"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:02:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <33E83BAA-5314-402A-9A3B-ADF6C7BE42FE@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang@ietf.org>, Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk>
To: hezihao9512 <hezihao9512@gmail.com>
References: <0cab196d775e45668ef2fec69f317ce1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <7E297315-1B5B-437D-A447-221E8DAA5388@gmx.com> <A670F3DD-DEBC-40D5-8890-A5D43233362F@cisco.com> <0D8F77A1-3B91-4D6E-A7F2-5720EF0AFA51@gmx.com> <A60591D3-7598-4BFB-9F30-A69257D65E01@thehobsons.co.uk> <D97294FF-5684-43B2-AD85-DB0C47D1A204@cisco.com> <A748CBA5-B787-484D-B73B-A30EFBF19631@fugue.com> <33E83BAA-5314-402A-9A3B-ADF6C7BE42FE@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/T92gT3IqUZ3ySN6OloS6uBNigOk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-04 - DUID representation in the model
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:02:27 -0000

On Dec 15, 2017, at 12:18 AM, hezihao9512 <hezihao9512@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I think the separation of types might be better in a way.

Understood.   But is this possible in the yang model?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email