Re: [dhcwg] IMPORTANT - IETF-92 (Dallas) DHC WG Session & Agenda Items

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2311A1AE3 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:42:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kB2o7ML7t-Wj for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC78F1A1A64 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:42:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fb4so5710028wid.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:42:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OgQknUtTYPeCR7ocAZ5USnhHMUP0OX5vqTYhYoDjtn0=; b=WnGAddwLs6K2/+5hPjV5sp5uxX+cE1xpMNCnqdqlvE9GAMZNNJvL3eXoqWEJ9y39/F NsTsXqcQEDpJnkDIdq0CuEg8B9Aa7YS8WMlVCtuSz5B3bCYg3fg9z0tEw8G5AjGFYrBi hWuIw/2kaWA5VqYnGVFRcNVsKnx2DRLeRwVtQWe/ABjL2cK4F8QeCRBgpN+KAkp8PKSh 6EbD5mmNYQTKjItqWerxdvkYacCA0b7kMgKbiPqezxd1FPOYH6NSiSzSQJLzHswSdnSL E6sAESzYTREjun8fmWfvoywvxPPDo5t8INj5dliU3tBN2OeVhQEY1kor/WsxBBREAghU MgKw==
X-Received: by 10.180.221.38 with SMTP id qb6mr7210325wic.73.1423075366456; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (109107011157.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa3sm2212960wib.17.2015.02.04.10.42.45 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54D26821.8010807@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:42:41 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7A8322@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7A8322@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20150204194241543
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/TCSGOxF9FdJhY8cFzHroEdhWQgM>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IMPORTANT - IETF-92 (Dallas) DHC WG Session & Agenda Items
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:42:50 -0000

On 09.01.2015 16:46, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
Name of session: DHCP privacy update

Name of draft(s):
- draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy-00
- draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-00
- 2 additional mitigation drafts that will be published before Dallas

Time requested: 15-30mins
(depending on how much time we get, we may present only the major points
or go into more details, if time permits).

Presenter name(s): To be determined

> Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
> accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
> status update):
Go through the issues identified in the privacy drafts, present
considered solutions and get feedback.

Tomek