IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6

Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com> Sun, 24 June 2012 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998EB21F8508 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdVkiseUeNof for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E5921F8505 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so1818857vcq.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n8UXFINB3E1obGBAkbkZHoao56gDvwMhiFdJM8bFntU=; b=rMP3M9UbJ3T8bgYfLhKeFxXdetfzm37ZMr9eeXX9YOD9DnbqboKlp7kbnTRmiMqOLt B+9g6ST2pTPU05jkqn1OhuR7SHY1MuPCyT8nDhR0eIfzbGnDbZ46JMvTB1mqQ4ZSRRzm aJ3fXvdPYBWzWb21eW+/cHWILokuUv6IudKOH1sAR2O/iBmM1XH4qwyVykPZ4QYoFoYg +eV3dgJqKddcmWqF0KnVrx2ghRdH6qcdVAAZAr2A2AYIMbX+rpahP23FKcp6hjmuncWG 1pROakRBILWfiy9CWzKA3DZh+ER0nJKxDZ/yyqjOlSFJcItWyrWu9ivGqo9338pSGiol hJ8A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.240.147 with SMTP id la19mr5860838vcb.47.1340560021445; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.28.84 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D9C15D2-BA8F-4D54-85DC-7343DAFBBA7D@nominum.com>
References: <201206241709.q5OH9qOt044422@givry.fdupont.fr> <2D9C15D2-BA8F-4D54-85DC-7343DAFBBA7D@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:47:01 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC16W0Cngo2VOB1XM7iB=B4sNgatV6SjWqcD3T9M-RU8M1dewg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:47:02 -0000

Ted and Francis,

Tomasz and I (well mostly Tomasz) have actually started something on
this topic.
There is a draft available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrugalski-softwire-dhcpv4-over-v6-option-00.
We did submit it to Softwire, though. Should it move to DHC?

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>
> => if this could not delay the adoption of DHCPv4 over IPv6 I agree.
>
>
> It would be independent, I think.   It might have a normative or informative
> reference to the DHCPv4 over IPv6 draft, but not vice versa.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email