[dhcwg] Fwd: RFC-to-be: <draft-ietf-dhc-csr-07.txt>

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 09 October 2002 20:54 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04130 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:54:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g99KtmK17489 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:55:48 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org []) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99Ktlv17486 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:55:47 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04123 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain []) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99KrJv17371; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:53:19 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org []) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99KqFv17330 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:52:15 -0400
Received: from funnel.cisco.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03972 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rdroms-w2k.cisco.com (rtp-vpn2-282.cisco.com []) by funnel.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA05287 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:52:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <>
X-Sender: rdroms@funnel.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:52:00 -0400
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: RFC-to-be: <draft-ietf-dhc-csr-07.txt>
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Well, considering we're now at option code 121, perhaps I should start the 
process of resolving the status of some of the unused option codes.  Here 
are some option codes that should be easy to decide on:

Option  Name
------  --------
83, 84   Relay agent options
89       FQDNs in DHCP options
91       VINES TCP/IP server
96       IPv6 Transition
100      Printer name
101-107 Multicast assignment through DHCP
108      Swap path
110      IPX compatibility

These option codes were assigned based on requests to IANA, but none of the 
associated options were ever published as RFCs.  I've tried to contact the 
persons to whom these option codes were assigned, and have either received 
an ack that the option codes can be returned or no response to my 
e-mail.  As an informal next step, please respond to the mailing list if 
you know of any implementation or use of any of these option codes.

- Ralph

>From: "IANA" <iana@icann.org>
>To: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, <rfc@stuartcheshire.org>,
>         <bernie.volz@ericsson.com>
>Cc: <rdroms@cisco.com>
>Subject: RFC-to-be: <draft-ietf-dhc-csr-07.txt>
>Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:16:48 -0700
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>Importance: Normal
>We are working on the IANA Actions for RFC-to-be:
>We have assigned value 121 to the Classless Static
>Route Option.  Please see the following for the
>registration and make sure everything looks OK:
>Please reply back with a final OK so that we may
>send a message to the RFC Editor indicating that the
>IANA Actions are completed.
>Thank you,
>Michelle S. Cotton
>IANA Administrator

dhcwg mailing list