Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6
Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Fri, 01 February 2013 15:54 UTC
Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E281F0D05 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:54:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f1pMVLZpbdfN for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451D21F0CF7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so739804wid.11 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:54:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hPtlflLYbt67dQErcavfhylDxbG0aHVDKhTQ1FwsjpY=; b=iABMFMxcWXIUAf43Q99TEcNjFpfWxfO20EIxqPc+XeROcJkBa9Tqn7UvCXjg36Lvqo jL9avyP9U4piO5Pzs4h32Pjyi9Tt3tLaZ1TrWCvqOYvgFE3Hl5xNSvvxcTJ6Y7Qbb9PF lHzLRP2BIP9oG/9DcfIKFwRv9nYiGxkWfKRAxjk60DsXMLcjUQrLbPRfNxD0SMF0uEI6 QjF8RGElpoRC15E3YdOIySstGJHWdrl52Lcb+jUao1ddCk3duuzKdPvIhv+M3sXzG99W hE8IcPrWiVyFltUblpVP0mt/DNcIqSavItLm8xE8wCDX7f8wncqV+mvcbepXsXpvtnr+ 9o+A==
X-Received: by 10.194.57.231 with SMTP id l7mr3560103wjq.9.1359734077335; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6061:1:88c4:35da:ce2c:16ef? ([2001:470:6061:1:88c4:35da:ce2c:16ef]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ec3sm4122135wib.1.2013.02.01.07.54.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <510BE537.6050302@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:54:31 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE519D1A74F3@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <B14A62A57AB87D45BB6DD7D9D2B78F0B114EDEDF@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <20130201154226.GJ22295@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747479218@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747479218@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130201165431815
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:54:39 -0000
On 01.02.2013 16:49, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Feb 1, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU> wrote: >> There is also draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-04 >> which handles the case for DHCPv6 clients. That also requires no >> changes to clients--only the DHCPv6 Relay Agent. > > This document doesn't apply to SLAAC or CGA addresses, though—just > stateful addresses acquired through DHCPv6. Admittedly, we could > also snoop DHCPINFORM traffic, but there's no guarantee that all > devices on the network will do a DHCPINFORM, even if the O bit is > set. That's INFORMATION-REQUEST, right? Or do we talk here about some not obvious matching strategy between v4 and v6? And I think there's no O bit for v4... Tomek
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] MAC Address Tracking via DHCP6 Tim Chown