Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02

Sunil Gandhewar <sgandhewar@juniper.net> Mon, 14 July 2014 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sgandhewar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7FF1A0070 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-_ZONRZBtEu for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 02:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0237.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC3181A0051 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 02:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR05MB237.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.41.146) by BY2PR05MB238.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.41.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.980.8; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:09:22 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB237.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.77]) by BY2PR05MB237.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.77]) with mapi id 15.00.0985.008; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:09:22 +0000
From: Sunil Gandhewar <sgandhewar@juniper.net>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dhcpv6bis@etf.org" <dhcpv6bis@etf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02
Thread-Index: AQHPl7H5+nczx3/upEqtjXwMsyvafZud6sBg
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:09:21 +0000
Message-ID: <b4b9c4eaff654321a2e48429adfb0865@BY2PR05MB237.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20140704171020.22117.76924.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53B6EBD6.6090509@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53B6EBD6.6090509@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.19]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
x-forefront-prvs: 02723F29C4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(199002)(377424004)(377454003)(189002)(19580395003)(76176999)(2656002)(83072002)(79102001)(19580405001)(85852003)(76482001)(85306003)(86362001)(83322001)(21056001)(74502001)(46102001)(107046002)(99286002)(15202345003)(87936001)(92566001)(50986999)(81542001)(77096002)(66066001)(106116001)(81342001)(105586002)(15975445006)(54356999)(74662001)(33646001)(31966008)(99396002)(106356001)(95666004)(80022001)(74316001)(101416001)(64706001)(20776003)(4396001)(77982001)(76576001)(108616002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB238; H:BY2PR05MB237.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/WUiC1_YE-qEAGwsz410HuZ1wHsU
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:09:27 -0000

Hi,

I have following comments:

1. Need to include Universal DUID in section 24.5

2. The following text from Section 22.6 should be removed:
   An IA Address option may appear only in an IA_NA option or an IA_TA
   option.
Because RFC 5007 DHCPv6 Leasequery and 5460 DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery uses this option inside OPTION_LQ_QUERY (section 4.1.2.1 RFC 5007), OPTION_CLIENT_DATA (section 4.1.2.2 of RFC 5007). Section 4.4.2 of RFC 5007 explains the use.


Regards,
Sunil Gandhewar


-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 11:31 PM
To: dhcwg
Subject: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02

We managed to upload rfc3315bis-02 before the deadline. There are too many changes to mention here, so we're keeping a changelog. See appendices A (changes since RFC3315) and B (changes since RFC3633).
The lists now mention 30 changes.

In general, we managed to merge around 80% of the RFC3633 text. The outstanding text will likely be affected by the stateful-issues, so we're waiting for this discussion to be resolved first.

You can see the progress here:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/roadmap

The changes will be briefly presented in Toronto, but we'll focus more on unresolved issues.

Thanks a lot to everyone who helped move this effort forward.

Andrew, Bernie, Marcin, Michael, Sheng, Ted and Tomek (the DHCPv6bis team)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02.txt
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:10:20 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>, "Bernie Volz"
<volz@cisco.com>, "Tomek Mrugalski" <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>, Michael C. Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Sheng Jiang"
<jiangsheng@huawei.com>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, "Andrew Yourtchenko" <ayourtch@cisco.com>, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "Marcin Siodelski" <msiodelski@gmail.com>, "Michael Richardson"
<mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Ted Lemon" <ted.lemon@nominum.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Tomek Mrugalski and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis
Revision:	02
Title:		Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) bis
Document date:	2014-07-04
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		119
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dhcwg-dhc-rfc3315bis-02

Abstract:
   The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCP) enables DHCP
   servers to pass configuration parameters such as IPv6 network
   addresses to IPv6 nodes.  It offers the capability of automatic
   allocation of reusable network addresses and additional configuration
   flexibility.  This protocol is a stateful counterpart to "IPv6
   Stateless Address Autoconfiguration" (RFC 4862), and can be used
   separately or concurrently with the latter to obtain configuration
   parameters.





Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg