Re: [dhcwg] Opinion requested: Independent submission of draft-gont-dhcpv6-stable-privacy-addresses-01
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 03 May 2016 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F28C12D10F; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pqTaDu39B56U; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73F312B05C; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id bi2so124417184igb.0; Tue, 03 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=g+r3iEy46VcfX/yDRAZUKTh7M/PyONns/Z2QfOx73CQ=; b=tZOhp6VG9UYtz1cQRF6eofnnDZnuQLM4wvlOS7Lw0UiIlG86v1RUnpVXjbI1r2MieL YTYf9UmIxXqcILIuBfTpslc2DOYbW/daGl6AMIwGHCXIPiIh85Kbr6m5XTw5bFfPWr/I dKIZukZ9AaHOJ5ujy/DF4s0za+TajJLoi19/OTaH2tuMn1Gh2LvcmMWBcCmHp9CcZRnZ J70QeiBYevUz4stGMH2qzV2wlofMUlJ4mWsasr4qomOHh9PTx6DjtBz8y94bi8HcBzvG Z/cg2ae23CNJa/Uu9hP+wb+fsDFs1fZdeH/B+KyVG5gGEUtf53PO60G8mjHWDZLse1HB iQdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=g+r3iEy46VcfX/yDRAZUKTh7M/PyONns/Z2QfOx73CQ=; b=aiANDr7a+oD4ILq0fmS9dQyvMwJ88euT0haQdFpu/33P7oYuOTRVa/yDa/do8aQmje BNHS0PzJV2A6Br5lJPCML4CC+8x00crASSmY1edaNdZ7ghIiDslXSyTAaEtehk5MWWt8 HWcwwJWLYsksQ/KaVRQaR/FZAtPdWAbruhGGX32lJ7vsYRptbb+9u/KrIpYhU+gWOYCj hGf6IrAmHriTDPmvKqJksN63NmwLhqf/mYFcJFUJSwftqAn9t+LAjCSjolivd3XnEl5K 42d0lLSmHJDpoUPpNKte/Wp57eE5pJAxUD62V+UhbLAjm+sLznctC5q3ndCbjwvojuIc k0Vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXRTMrxh4OMDoslZ6s8ifgeMyYg80oFSX5u713iwHBYsl1Hw94dCVKz4pbskBoxrgN+jmIACm93s+tGwQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.100.135 with SMTP id ey7mr27135773igb.41.1462299618105; Tue, 03 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.19.218 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <571EC059.8090005@ericsson.com>
References: <571EC059.8090005@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:20:18 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4FcNgJfvCRrAHslm2S2-FeVt0ns
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcX3hrSkqRaA=at==bP+d=XuOmRSui-ppa3Mazww2J8tQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/WlL3TieHCcVFTXATYV57NR_DLEQ>
Cc: "dhc-chairs@ietf.org" <dhc-chairs@ietf.org>, DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Opinion requested: Independent submission of draft-gont-dhcpv6-stable-privacy-addresses-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 18:20:21 -0000
At Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:11:53 -0400, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote: > The draft describing Stable and Opaque IIDs with DHCPv6 available at > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-dhcpv6-stable-privacy-addresses-01 > > has been submitted through the Independent stream for publication. > > The IESG is currently performing a conflict review on the document as > described in RFC5742. This document is up for discussion on the 2016-05-05 > IESG Telechat. Since this document was discussed earlier in the dhc working > group, I would like to solicit the opinion of the WG and the WG chairs on > whether publishing the document is in any way harmful to the work of the dhc > WG. Please send your opinions either on list or privately to me by 2016-05-03. I've not read the individual versions of the draft so closely, but assuming it's not so different from the wg-doc version, I don't think it's *harmful* for the dhc wg. I didn't think it was that useful and I thought it was not clear whether it's worth the publishing cost, though. See my old comment on a wg version when the wg discussed whether to drop it as a wg item: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg16479.html I believe it still applies to the latest individual version. -- JINMEI, Tatuya