Re: [dhcwg] Question on RFC2131 / RFC1541
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 00:51 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506CB128D3E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZIHLSHm3Ev6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3FF128D19 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u42so43402546qte.7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=juj+ziY7zq9h7O0V39ogrhBV6ooEakkCPqHQr1vTSZ8=; b=cA/OlQxJosCgpgvp/S6pNGVoinloYJBYXNlggtF0yGX+Q8lI3YCPRejJzJJB1+7owa hLOVshNFGOvV/cf8l47XSAyv+BfLs5JdsXGaxBZMtOUonjukqGdN4FORhfK4TDABqsty mRJbzpVNMn7ZjtoLZohhZ8S6cCEiEhEvm66ZoyoONy17YvuWs36GUq6cU1PItKWz9HRH iQoxldW2TgZuPwh5AHoH/9K7vXh+Kr6qKETXOyaezow7kGwSxQMiNL3EBpSqhkNb1wW5 ueokFEAziojq6voWRPoRkHb8WgeHk+ThoVtGyaZeobw4SC9KLr6ATK4eguGFl7QLsLdK s81Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=juj+ziY7zq9h7O0V39ogrhBV6ooEakkCPqHQr1vTSZ8=; b=nI35dp0MbK3ed9TFvVYiwkTYgSPZYuwyclNgvN3ivRJ47cY+28T/vyOaGNJqY0PXob NMRPwAndrm5EPx4TX2uuXZ2TcApavMJ7v0FTHRGFnn2Gm9px98nLcrq7447t4tiyH+AE iKfDGMLmFPv/X/+UG1doMXibeav7HANf2x7eqBLlLsBYnSX6jmJTnFI7BcM20loFHwyB gbzW3k1dHAAFkK9vv9DoyvTxTgk0SN4Py5QmP04Y6G0g7aPprzmpkB4BN+IxzxDChWwX YoNsnocaBgPaDeo/scXEWz6q5RtMSw+yacCTm4qk5JbOAYqMvTpILh1VFXJVHLYawZJz bLpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKIKAJ7tO9VR2R+SfJvbRJUcobflOnlg4gCjm2J+Ke6Lurjocsp 3Ez6tqSxin+P6bf/0FH9XGr5HQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosu6uPnYs3aDZjzxBDoLvP572qmSG31t2Ly+54P0z450i5fd/udu6wLvFaJHPbVcKfOwc2ReQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.124.198 with SMTP id x189mr3152194qkc.332.1513039863763; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v17sm4922695qkl.36.2017.12.11.16.51.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <92E00282-063B-416E-B7C9-E4502F6DFCBA@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22F3B010-2F05-4E2C-8C8A-4842C2B59A1C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:51:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m2wp1sakzr.fsf@discipline.rit.edu>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, savi@ietf.org
To: Andrew W Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
References: <m2wp1sakzr.fsf@discipline.rit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/XXxj0i3XHeXwgf8TVIo4mLdT3oM>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Question on RFC2131 / RFC1541
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:51:08 -0000
On Dec 11, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Andrew W Elble <aweits@rit.edu> wrote: > Should clients be re-using the same XID that was used in the initial > DHCPDISCOVER at renewal? No.
- [dhcwg] Question on RFC2131 / RFC1541 Andrew W Elble
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on RFC2131 / RFC1541 Ted Lemon