Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues - Section 4.2. Placement of Status Codes
Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh> Tue, 10 June 2014 09:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rjs@rob.sh>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F601A0390 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgPbXp49FgeN for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cappuccino.rob.sh (cappuccino.rob.sh [IPv6:2a03:9800:10:4c::cafe:b00c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AB71A001B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [109.144.197.18] (helo=[10.210.205.254]) by cappuccino.rob.sh with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rjs@rob.sh>) id 1WuIK8-0005ze-5i; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:26:32 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47C73CB1-C97A-409D-A49D-4E031F490AA7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B04792A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:26:34 +0100
Message-Id: <0A8E2C3C-2490-445B-9404-EA1F3BCCF2FD@rob.sh>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B04792A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/XkWtPqM9uS33_eMADBEsCTesUkM
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Rob Shakir <rob.shakir@bt.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues - Section 4.2. Placement of Status Codes
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:26:38 -0000
On 25 May 2014, at 14:43, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote: > ** ACTION NEEDED FROM YOU: > > Does anyone have any concerns or objections regarding this change? Hi Bernie, First off, thanks to you and your co-authors for looking at this one in more detail, and the comprehensive write-up. I’m wholly supportive of the change that you propose - I think this is the cleanest and most logical recommendation to make. Kind regards, r.
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues - S… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues… Rob Shakir