Re: [dhcwg] DHCP CGA Integration Work

Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com> Mon, 23 November 2009 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <shengjiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A143A6808 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.825, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRlTqPRj4Y08 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039CA3A672F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KTJ00AI9GKZKX@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:38:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KTJ005N2GKY8E@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:38:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from j66104a ([10.111.12.74]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KTJ00IABGKYJM@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:38:58 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:38:58 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
In-reply-to:
To: 'Ted Lemon' <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, 'Behcet Sarikaya' <sarikaya@ieee.org>, 'Behcet Sarikaya' <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
Message-id: <005a01ca6bdd$ba3154a0$4a0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcpokMj7F0cS1yU0SDuTTvorWk48oAAKwNqgAMhzquA=
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP CGA Integration Work
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:39:13 -0000

Hi, Ted,

The WG should  first review "DHCPv6 and CGA Interaction: Problem Statement"
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-00.txt, which analyses
the possible interactions between CGA and DHCPv6.

We introduced these PS and works it suggests in the CSI meeting in IETF 76.
draft-xia-dhc-host-gen-id, draft-jiang-csi-cga-config-dhcpv6,
draft-jiang-dhc-secure-dhcpv6 are all suggested.

I guess DHC WG may be interested to include them in the new charter.

Best regards,

Sheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> Of Ted Lemon
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:50 AM
> To: Behcet Sarikaya; Behcet Sarikaya
> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP CGA Integration Work
> 
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> >   We suggest DHCP-CGA integration work to be taken up in
> DHC WG as it is most relevant here.
> > 
> >   Please let us know the next steps, is a rechartering required?
> 
> There was certainly interest at the meeting in Hiroshima.   
> For the DHC working group to take this draft on as a working 
> group item, we would have to recharter.   The charter does 
> however cover review of the draft for DHCP-related issues.   
> Which are you proposing that we do?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg