IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Conclusion for draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-00

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Sun, 19 May 2013 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F4321F89EB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUtWns2NhMO1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEDE21F896D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kl13so4986374pab.34 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=csHL4ReFk8ByvKn9H50QHomdt+cphv3hQBk3vizOIDQ=; b=0+Hswnq+HwoJOQqfJtbgzSG2KTmJzefwu36jCBm7yPriDquRfxHmSxdNU7UvyXg2JS UA4xrV1P9/YdAIGfXBUErDxw9HaU5emzmqoLSofQGN5DXIt1CTJycGahm8S4+DEmYe6L xJ0x24NGFvw6vSvtZsxie8WJFIb5rztfzqnLdv4elLKFlSuWvv/QzrbCs0w35qSEZwxP KBpx7tZAWOU5eTtm8Kw/o3qiTNvNgM346B4Es2avQ9iFoI+UNmMNYWMP9EFSZx0h3o5L nXC5IIwXtjAung6Npm10bcjc/flwkc/uoPgsvsCq0LzserVvPBlVx6p0cvK3Qo0xrgcU iTGw==
X-Received: by 10.68.245.170 with SMTP id xp10mr2713682pbc.41.1368980245617; Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([114.255.40.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fr1sm20200665pbb.26.2013.05.19.09.17.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077519F6EF@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 00:17:19 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE0B5816-EDE1-4EAF-9A2F-1B62E55F078B@gmail.com>
References: <1775E640-867C-41E3-8EAC-2554D80D4DF6@cisco.com> <CDBA4957.707B7%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <786F13AA11E69F4DB2CCA23F7400C2FB0142D776@S2010EXCH1.ad.local> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077519F6EF@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "volz@cisco.com" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Conclusion for draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 16:17:31 -0000

Dear all,

> I think that would have to be restricted to "broken relays may need to be fixed," because relays _really_ shouldn't be dropping unknown message types, even though 3315 never _required_ them not to.

Yes. I think this is what the unknown message draft (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-00) documents, which intends to update RFC3315. 

BTW, should we include draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-00 as a reference in the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 draft?

Best Regards,
Qi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email