Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message-00

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 02 July 2009 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837823A6A91 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6LSzeoEIXEM for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189C83A697B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSk0GLAXaFIvOMo1pPX4TrRCc8LFiQO1g@postini.com; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:10:38 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3081B83F2; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uma.here (71.32.40.139) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:35 -0700
Message-ID: <7CC2A89B-54D0-4670-93BC-2E84D85B78A9@nominum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <200907021303.51113.budm@weird-solutions.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:10:33 -0700
References: <5033E739-18FA-4328-A276-E6D159052AAA@cisco.com> <200903171740.19574.budm@weird-solutions.com> <F2E7FCAE-3E96-400F-8096-3A03D16E29DC@nominum.com> <200907021303.51113.budm@weird-solutions.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:10:16 -0000

On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:03 AM, Bud Millwood wrote:
> Accidental omission, terribly sorry. I'm fine with both drafts.

Great, thanks for clarifying!